No abstract

Background: Laparoscopic skill was measured objectively in a simulator. Seven tasks were scored in terms of precision and speed. These tasks included transferring, cutting, clip+ divide, placement of a ligating loop, mesh placement+ fixation, and suturing with intracorporeal and extracorporeal knot. Methods: After baseline evaluation, 12 surgical residents were randomized to either five weekly practice sessions (Group A) or no practice (Group B). Each group was then retested. Performance scores were compared for baseline versus final test, and improvement (baseline to final) for Group A versus Group B. Group A residents had a total of seven repetitions of each task (baseline, five practices, final). Linear regression analysis was used to test for the correlation between score and repetition number. Results: Group A showed significant improvement in their scores (baseline to final) for each task and for the total score (sum of all tasks) (p < 0.05). Group B showed significant improvement in four of seven tasks and for the total score. The magnitude of improvement of Group A versus Group B residents was significantly greater for four of seven tasks (peg transfer, placement of ligating loop, and both suturing skills) and for the total score. The final total score for Group A was 219 ± 14% of baseline (p < 0.0001), whereas Group B was only 162 ± 35% of baseline (p ‫ס‬ 0.07) and not statistically significant. For Group A residents, there was a highly significant correlation between trial number and performance score (p < 0.05) for each individual task and for the total score. Conclusions: Laparoscopic skill can be measured objectively in a simulator, and performance improves progressively with practice. These skills can be incorporated into the training and evaluation of residents in laparoscopic surgery. Key words: Laparoscopy -Laparoscopic trainingSimulation -EducationLaparoscopic surgery requires ambidexterity, eye-hand coordination, and depth perception. In addition, the surgeon must learn how to operate using new instruments. Many methods have been proposed for training and credentialing. An opportunity for training in laparoscopy outside the operating room would allow the trainee to acquire these skills in an inexpensive and relaxed environment. Structured teaching permits a thorough understanding of the principles of surgery and lays a foundation for the development of more difficult operative tasks [3].The MISTELS program (McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills) has been used previously to evaluate residents across all years of training, laparoscopic surgeons, and nonlaparoscopic surgeons [1]. The aim was to standardize the teaching and evaluation of basic laparoscopic skills. The tasks performed in the simulator were scored objectively. A significant correlation was demonstrated between level of training and performance for most exercises.The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of structured practice of basic laparoscopic skills in a laparoscopi...

The MISTELS metrics have excellent reliability, which exceeds the threshold level of 0.8 required for high-stakes evaluations. These findings support the use of MISTELS for evaluation in many different settings, including residency training programs.

Performance in an in vitro laparoscopic simulator correlated significantly with performance in an in vivo animal model. Practice in the simulator resulted in improved performance in vivo.