Truck axle configurations and weights have changed significantly since the AASHO road study was conducted in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Emerging concerns about the effects of new axle configurations on pavement damage, which is unaccounted for in the AASHTO procedure, have prompted several researchers to investigate the impacts of different axle and truck configurations on pavement performance. However, there is still a need to strengthen the mechanistic findings using field data. In this paper, actual in-service traffic and pavement performance data for flexible pavements in the state of Michigan are considered. Monitored truck traffic data for different truck configurations are used to identify their relative damaging effects on flexible pavements in terms of cracking, rutting, and roughness. The analysis included simple, multiple, and stepwise regression. The results indicated that trucks with multiple axles ͑tridem or more͒ appear to produce more rutting damage than those with only single and tandem axles. On the other hand, trucks with single and tandem axles tend to cause more cracking. Pavement roughness results did not show enough evidence to draw a firm conclusion.

The new FHWA Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-E PDG) does away with the AASHO-derived concept of the equivalent single-axle load and calculates damage caused by various axle configurations directly. Because multiple axles represent about half the axle configurations that the pavement will experience, there is a need to evaluate the M-E PDG procedure for predicting rutting due to multiple-axle configurations. Axle factors (AFs) based on rutting were calculated for different axle configurations by using three procedures: the M-E PDG, accounting for the effect of each individual axle within a group, and integrating the entire strain pulse. The AFs from these procedures were compared with laboratory-derived values for asphalt concrete. Also, layer rutting contributions were predicted for six in-service SPS-1 experiment sections from the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program with the M-E PDG software and were compared with the analysis of their transverse surface profiles. The results show that the M-E PDG procedure underestimates rutting prediction due to multiple axles. Calibration of the M-E PDG rut models with field data seems to improve their prediction, although it is still lower than expected for multiple axles. The best method for calculating rut depths under multiple axles appears to be integration of the entire strain pulse. This method shows that rutting damage is proportional to the number of axles within an axle group. This theory was confirmed in the laboratory for asphalt concrete. Also, although the M-E PDG rut models are superior to previous rut models, in that they are able to dissect the total surface rutting between all pavement layers, their prediction of the individual layer rutting contributions does not always agree with results from the analysis of measured transverse profiles.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract