OBJECTIVES: Frailty and sarcopenia are known risk factors for adverse liver transplant outcomes and mortality. We hypothesized that frailty or sarcopenia could identify the risk for common serious transplant-related adverse respiratory events. METHODS: For 107 patients (74 men, 33 women) transplanted over 1 year, we measured frailty with gait speed, chair stands, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and sarcopenia with Skeletal Muscle Index on computed tomography at L3. We recorded the stress-tested cardiac double product as an index of cardiac work capacity. Outcomes included days of intubation, aspiration, clinical pneumonia, reintubation/tracheostomy, days to discharge, and survival. We modeled the outcomes using unadjusted regression and multivariable analyses controlled for (i) age, sex, and either Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Na (MELDNa) or Child–Turcotte–Pugh scores, (ii) hepatocellular carcinoma status, and (iii) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking history. Subgroup analysis was performed for living donor liver transplant and deceased donor liver transplant recipients. RESULTS: Gait speed was negatively associated with aspiration and pulmonary infection, both in unadjusted and MELDNa-adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio for aspiration 0.10 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–0.67] and adjusted odds ratio for pulmonary infection 0.12 [95% CI 0.02–0.75]). Unadjusted and MELDNa-adjusted models for gait speed (coefficient −1.47, 95% CI −2.39 to −0.56) and KPS (coefficient −3.17, 95% CI −5.02 to −1.32) were significantly associated with shorter intubation times. No test was associated with length of stay or need for either reintubation or tracheostomy. DISCUSSION: Slow gait speed, an index of general frailty, indicates significant risk for post-transplant respiratory complications. Intervention to arrest or reverse frailty merits exploration as a potentially modifiable risk factor for improving transplant respiratory outcomes.
Background Given the rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the limited data on its effect on the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we characterized multiyear patterns of disease severity in a cohort of IBD patients with coexistent DM. Methods Data of consented IBD patients followed prospectively in a natural history registry at a tertiary center between 2009 and 2017 were analyzed. Patients with ≥3 years of clinical follow-up were included. Patients identified with a diagnosis of DM were compared with 400 consecutive IBD controls without a diagnosis of DM, no laboratory evidence of hyperglycemia, and no history of antihyperglycemic treatment. Results Out of 2810 IBD patients, 141 (5%) had DM (IBD DM; 44% ulcerative colitis, 56% Crohn’s disease, 48.2% female). IBD DM had higher use of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5ASA) agents (P = 0.04), narcotics (P < 0.001), and antibiotics (P = 0.007) but not immunomodulators and/or biologics compared with IBD controls. When analyzing biomarkers of severity, IBD DM demonstrated higher frequencies of elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; P = 0.006), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; P = 0.001), eosinophilia (P = 0.004), monocytosis (P = 0.02), and hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.001). IBD DM had worse quality of life (mean Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; P < 0.001). IBD DM had increased health care utilization compared with controls (emergency room usage P = 0.008, hospitalizations P < 0.001, gastroenterology clinic visits P < 0.001, and median annual charges P < 0.001). Among IBD DM patients, the use of immunomodulators and/or biologics was not associated with further complications as measured by antibiotic use or hospitalizations. Conclusions This study of a large IBD cohort suggests that DM in IBD may be associated with increased disease severity and that there may be room for increasing use of highly effective immunomodulator and/or biologic agents in this group.
4 Laryngoscope, 126:2036-2040, 2016.
4. Laryngoscope, 127:1093-1096, 2017.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.