Summary:The relationship between inverted U wave in leads V5 and I1 and the location of myocardial ischemia was studied in 52 positive patients and in 50 negative patients with ergonovine provocation test, Development of a biphasic or negative U wave, or increased negativity of U wave (inverted U wave) was observed in 15 of 17 patients with spasm in only the right coronary artery (RCA), in 6 of 8 with spasm in only the left anterior descending artery (LAD), in 2 of 8 with spasm in only the left circumflex artery (LCx), and in 23 of 24 with spasm in two or more vessels. Of 52 positive patients in the ergonovine provocation test, 46 (88.5%) had inverted U wave. Of these, 17 (32.7%) had inverted U wave without discernible ST deviation. Of 50 negative patients, 2 had inverted U wave. Inverted U wave in lead Vs was frequently seen in patients with spasm of LAD, but this finding was not uncommon in spasm of RCA or LCx. On the other hand, inverted U wave in lead I1 was frequently seen in spasm of RCA and LCx, but not in spasm of LAD. These findings suggest that inverted U wave in lead V5 is not specific for myocardial ischemia due to spasm of LAD and that inverted U wave in lead I1 is specific for spasm of RCA and LCx.

Summary:To clarify the clinical significance of the negative U wave during acute myocardial ischemia, the appearance of the U wave and ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD group: 11 patients) or right coronary artery (RCA group: 18 patients) was studied. During PTCA, U-wave inversion (newly developed negative U wave, and increased negativity of the pre-existing negative U wave) was observed in 37 (90%) of 41 patients in the LAD group and in 16 (89%) of 18 patients in the RCA group. The incidence of ST-segment elevation was similar to that of U-wave inversion; however, U-wave inversion appeared before detectable ST-segment elevation in 20 patients (49%) in the LAD group and in 4 patients (22%) in the RCA group. Moreover, U-wave inversion was observed frequently in a wider range of leads than ST-segment elevation. These results suggest that the U wave is a more sensitive indicator of myocardial ischemia than STsegment elevation in some patients, and that a negative U wave may be produced by a different mechanism than that which produces ST-segment deviation, although both are related to myocardial ischemia.