Mechanical compression devices such as compression stockings assist in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism for nonambulatory postoperative patients. Risk factors in pediatric surgical patients increase their likelihood of developing a venous thromboembolism. This article describes an adolescent patient who developed pressure injuries from prolonged compression stocking use. Although other pressure injury prevention techniques were completed by nursing, the lack of knowledge regarding the risk of pressure injuries from compression stockings resulted in a poor outcome. As a result of this event, practice changes were implemented on the pediatric surgical unit to prevent reoccurrence. The practice changes included removal of compression stockings once per shift to assess extremities, daily replacement of new stockings, and utilization of sequential compression devices as the preferred mechanical compression method. Further research is needed for compression stocking use in the pediatric and adolescent population to provide best practice implications for nursing.
Introduction: An appendectomy is the most common urgent surgical intra-abdominal procedure performed on children. Approximately one third of the population ends up having complicated appendicitis requiring the use of intravenous antibiotics and a prolonged hospital stay. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a common obstacle seen in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Use of probiotics in a pediatric population exposed to antibiotics and gastrointestinal surgery such as an appendectomy may provide a protective effect and prevent AAD.Methods: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at a large freestanding pediatric hospital. Patients in the treatment group received a standard dose of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG capsule twice a day until discharge, and those in the control group received a placebo twice a day until discharge. In this study, we hypothesize that patients given probiotics will decrease the overall length of stay (LOS) by 25% versus the LOS in those patients who do not receive probiotics.Results: Ninety-eight patients were randomized, with 93 included in the data analysis, into the probiotic group (n = 57) and the placebo group (n = 41). The LOS for the probiotic group (n = 53; M = 121.55, SD = 59.51) was lower than that for the placebo group (n = 40; M = 131.69, SD = 74.27) but was not found to be statistically different (t(91) = 0.731, p = .467). The average total number of diarrhea counts was higher in the probiotic group (M = 13, SD = 16) than in the placebo group (M = 10, SD = 11) but was not found to be statistically different (t(91) = −1.017, p = .312).Discussion: Use of probiotics to reduce AAD has been found to be effective in other patient populations. Because of the small sample size, we were unable to determine if the use of L. rhamnosus in patients with complicated appendicitis was effective in reducing the LOS or average diarrhea counts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.