Purpose To determine the repeatability of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived shear stiffness measurements of the intervertebral disc (IVD) taken throughout the day and their relationship with IVD degeneration and subject age. Materials and Methods In a cross-sectional study, in vivo lumbar MR elastography was performed once in the morning and once in the afternoon in 47 subjects without current low back pain (IVDs = 230; age range, 20-71 years) after obtaining written consent under approval of the institutional review board. The Pfirrmann degeneration grade and MR elastography-derived shear stiffness of the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus regions of all lumbar IVDs were assessed by means of principal frequency analysis. One-way analysis of variance, paired t tests, concordance and Bland-Altman tests, and Pearson correlations were used to evaluate degeneration, diurnal changes, repeatability, and age effects, respectively. Results There were no significant differences between morning and afternoon shear stiffness across all levels and there was very good technical repeatability between the morning and afternoon imaging results for both nucleus pulposus (R = 0.92) and annulus fibrosus (R = 0.83) regions. There was a significant increase in both nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus MR elastography-derived shear stiffness with increasing Pfirrmann degeneration grade (nucleus pulposus grade 1, 12.5 kPa ± 1.3; grade 5, 16.5 kPa ± 2.1; annulus fibrosus grade 1, 90.4 kPa ± 9.3; grade 5, 120.1 kPa ± 15.4), and there were weak correlations between shear stiffness and age across all levels (R ≤ 0.32). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MR elastography-derived shear stiffness measurements are highly repeatable, weakly correlate with age, and increase with advancing IVD degeneration. These results suggest that MR elastography-derived shear stiffness may provide an objective biomarker of the IVD degeneration process. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Both authors reported that they have no financial relationships that pose a potential conflict of interest with this article.
Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. To study the feasibility, outcomes, and complications of transpedicular vertebrectomy (TPV), and reconstruction for metastatic lesions to the thoracic spine. Summary of Background Data. Metastatic lesions to the thoracic spine may need surgical treatment requiring anterior–posterior decompression/stabilization. Anterior reconstruction may be performed using poly methyl meth acrylate (PMMA) cement or cages. Use of cement has been reported to be associated with complications. Methods. From 2008 to 2016, consecutive cases (single surgeon) undergoing TPV for thoracic spine metastasis (T2–12) were included. Demographic, surgical, and clinical data were collected through chart review. MRI, CT, positron emission tomography images were used to identify extent of disease, epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC), and degree of vertebral body collapse. Hall–Wellner confidence band was used for the survival curve. Results. Ninety six patients were studies with a median age 60 years. Most patients 56 (58%) presented with mechanical pain. 29% cases had lung metastasis. Single level TPV was performed in 73 patients (76%). Anterior reconstruction included PMMA in 78 patients (81.25%), and titanium cage in 18 patients (18.25%). Frankel grade improvement was seen in 16 cases (P = 0.013). ESCC improved by a median of 5.9 mm (P < 0.001). Kyphosis reduced by median of 7.5° (P < 0.001). VAS improved by median of seven (P < 0.001). Total 59 deaths were observed. The median survival time was estimated to be 6 months (95% CI: 5, 10). Surgical outcome and complication rates are similar between the two construct types. Correction of kyphosis was seen to be slightly better with the use of PMMA. Overall 29.16% cases developed complications (11.4% major). Two cases developed neurological deficit following epidural hematoma requiring surgery. One case had instrumentation failure from cement migration, needing revision. Conclusion. The result of our study shows significantly improved clinical and radiological outcomes for TPV for thoracic metastatic lesions. We also discuss some important steps for use of PMMA to avoid complications. Level of Evidence: 4
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-accepted treatment option for patients with cervical spine disease. Three- and four-level discectomies are known to be associated with a higher complication rate and lower fusion rate than single-level surgery. This study was performed to evaluate and compare zero-profile fixation and stand-alone PEEK cages for three- and four-level ACDF.Methods: Two cohorts of patients who underwent ACDF for the treatment of three- and four-level disease were compared. Thirty-three patients underwent implantation of zero-profile devices that included titanium screw fixation (Group A). Thirty-five patients underwent implantation of stand-alone PEEK cages without any form of screw fixation (Group B).Results: In Group A, twenty-seven patients underwent a three-level and six patients a four-level ACDF, with a total of 105 levels. In Group B, thirty patients underwent a three-level and five patients underwent a four-level ACDF, with a total number of 110 levels. In Group A, the mean preoperative visual analog scale score (VAS) for arm pain was 6.4 (range 3-8), and the mean postoperative VAS for arm pain decreased to 2.5 (range 1-7). In group B, the mean preoperative VAS of arm pain was 7.1 (range 3-10), and the mean postoperative VAS of arm pain decreased to 2 (range 0-4). In Group A, four patients (12%) developed dysphagia, and in Group B, three patients (9%) developed dysphagia. Conclusions: This study found zero-profile instrumentation and PEEK cages to be both safe and effective for patients who underwent three- and four-level ACDF, comparable to reported series using plate devices. Rates of dysphagia for the cohort were much lower than reports using plate devices. Zero-profile segmental fixation devices and PEEK cages may be considered as viable alternatives over plate fixation for patients requiring multi-level anterior cervical fusion surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.