Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of dynamic compression plating against interlocking nail technique for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Place & Duration: Department of Orthopedic, Mardan Medical Complex, Mardan for the period of two years from April 2020 to October 2021. Methods: Fifty six patients (18-65 years old) of both sexes were included in the study because they had a humeral shaft fracture. The patients were randomly split into two groups. Both the dynamic compression plating group (n = 28) and the interlocking nail group (n = 28) received treatment. Radiographic examination both before and after surgery were performed. At the 12-day post-operative, complications following the operation were observed. The NEERs criteria were used to analyse the results of the functional assessments. Follow-up was taken at 6 months postoperatively. Results: Mean age of patients was 41.46±10.74 years. 42 (75%) patients were males while 25% were females. Road traffic accident was the most common cause found in 37 (66.07%) patients. Mean union time in DCP and INL group was 11.62±3.05 and 13.54±4.73 weeks. Shoulder stiffness was the commonest complication in both groups. At final follow up, in DCP group 24 (85.71%), 2 (7.14%) and 2 (7.14%) patients had excellent, good and fair outcomes, while in group B (INL) 19 (67.86%), 5 (17.86%) and 4 (14.29%) patients had excellent, good and fair outcomes. No significant difference was found in both groups regarding functional outcomes. Patients satisfaction was high in DCP group as compared to INL. Conclusion: Dynamic compression plating shows better outcomes in term of union time, complications and functional outcomes as compared to interlocking nail Technique. Keywords: Dynamic Compression Plating, Interlocking Nailing, Fracture Shaft of Humerus
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.