Artificial floating islands (AFIs) are a variation of wetland treatment systems for water quality improvement. This paper provides a review concerning AFIs in terms of their development, classification, and applications in the removal of nutrients, heavy metals, and chemical oxygen demand on waterways. The role of microorganisms, aquatic plants, and aquatic animals in AFIs for water decontamination and purification was also discussed. Additionally, some key factors influencing the AFIs’ performances were discussed and comparisons between AFIs and constructed wetlands were reviewed. Finally, further perspectives of artificial floating islands were identified to possibly improve their performances. The understanding of the mechanisms in AFIs that drive removal of various contaminants to improve water quality is crucial, and is also highlighted in this paper.

In order to strengthen in situ nitrogen removal of urban landscape water, a novel pilot-scale tubular bioreactor-enhanced floating treatment wetland (TB-EFTW) was constructed, and the long-term performance and responsible microbial mechanisms were investigated in this study. The results showed that the system could remove 81.5% nitrogen from the landscape water after 240 days' operation. Moreover, the contribution rate of plant absorption to nitrogen was low (8.3%), which indicated that microbial biotransformation rather than plant absorption played a more key role in nitrogen removal in TB-EFTW system. The declining dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration along the axial direction of tubular bioreactor (TB) resulted in the sequential bacterial community of nitrifying, aerobic denitrifying, and anoxic denitrifying bacteria in the front, middle, and final part of TB. High-throughput sequencing results demonstrated that the internal environment of the system realized the coexistence of nitrifying, aerobic denitrifying and anoxic denitrifying process. The reason was mainly because that oxic-anoxic (O-A) areas were formed in sequence along the axial direction of tubular bioreactor. Overall, a unique advantage in nitrogen removal was achieved in TB-EFTW, which could provide important references for in situ treatment of urban landscape water. • Practitioner points• TB-EFTW strengthened nitrogen removal for in situ urban landscape water treatment. • Microbial conversion played a key role in nitrogen removal of the TB-EFTW system. • The unique distribution of oxic-anoxic (O-A) areas was formed in sequence along the TB. • Nitrification, aerobic, and anoxic denitrification were synergistically involved in the TB.• Key words agriculture; biological treatment; nitrogen removal; surface water

A novel tubular bioreactor‐enhanced floating treatment wetland (TB‐EFTW) was developed for the in situ treatment of high nitrate river water. When compared with the enhanced floating treatment wetland (EFTW), the TB‐EFTW system achieved 30% higher total nitrogen removal efficiency. Further, the average TN level of the TB‐EFTW effluent was below the Grade IV requirement (1.5 mg/L) specified in Chinese standard (GB3838‐2002). Microbial analysis revealed that both aerobic and anoxic denitrifying bacteria coexisted in the new system. The relative abundance of aerobic and anoxic denitrifiers were 42.69% and 22% at the middle and end of the tubular bioreactor (TB), respectively. It is reasonable to assume that effective nitrogen removal can mainly be attributed to the addition of solid carbon source and the spatial difference in DO distribution (oxic–anoxic areas in sequence) inside the TB. The initial investment cost and operating costs associated with the TB‐EFTW system are approximately 14,000 and 3500 yuan per 1000 m3 river water, respectively. Considering its low cost, minimal maintenance requirements, and effective nitrogen removal, this newly developed system can be regarded as a promising technology for treating high nitrate river water. Practitioner Points A novel TB‐EFTW system was developed to upgrade traditional in situ treatment techniques. The TB‐EFTW could achieve 30% higher nitrogen removal efficiency than EFTWs. Both aerobic and anoxic denitrifying bacteria coexisted in the system. The system shows better technical and economic performance compared with routine techniques.

No abstract