Members of the DExH/D superfamily of nucleic acid-activated nucleotide triphosphatases are essential for virtually all aspects of RNA metabolism, including pre-messenger RNA splicing, RNA interference, translation, and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Physiological substrates for these enzymes are thought to be regions of double-stranded RNA, because several DExH/D proteins catalyze strand separation in vitro. These "RNA helicases" can also disrupt RNA-protein interactions, but it is unclear whether this activity is coupled to duplex unwinding. Here we demonstrate that two unrelated DExH/D proteins catalyze protein displacement independently of duplex unwinding. Therefore, the essential functions of DExH/D proteins are not confined to RNA duplexes but can be exerted on a wide range of ribonucleoprotein substrates.

The DExH/D protein family is the largest group of enzymes in eukaryotic RNA metabolism. DExH/D proteins are mainly known for their ability to unwind RNA duplexes in an ATP-dependent fashion. However, it has become clear in recent years that these DExH/D RNA helicases are also involved in the ATP-dependent remodeling of RNA–protein complexes. Here we review recent studies that highlight physiological roles of DExH/D proteins in the displacement of proteins from RNA. We further discuss work with simple RNA–protein complexes in vitro, which illuminates mechanisms by which DExH/D proteins remove proteins from RNA. Although we are only beginning to understand how DExH/D proteins remodel RNA–protein complexes, these studies have shown that an ‘RNA helicase’ does not per se require cofactors to displace proteins from RNA, that protein displacement does not necessarily involve RNA duplex unwinding, and that not all DExH/D proteins are able to disassemble the same range of ribonucleoproteins.

Eukaryotic translation initiation involves two conserved DEAD-box RNA helicases, eIF4A and Ded1p. Here we show that S. cerevisiae eIF4A and Ded1p directly interact with each other and simultaneously with the scaffolding protein eIF4G. We delineate a comprehensive thermodynamic framework for the interactions between Ded1p, eIF4A, eIF4G, RNA and ATP, which indicates that eIF4A, with and without eIF4G, acts as a modulator for activity and substrate preferences of Ded1p, which is the RNA remodeling unit in all complexes. Our results reveal and characterize an unexpected interdependence between the two RNA helicases and eIF4G, and suggest that Ded1p is an integral part of eIF4F, the complex comprising eIF4G, eIF4A, and eIF4E.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16408.001

DExH/D proteins catalyze NTP-driven rearrangements of RNA and RNA-protein complexes during most aspects of RNA metabolism. Although the vast majority of DExH/D proteins displays virtually no sequence-specificity when remodeling RNA complexes in vitro, the enzymes clearly distinguish between al arge number of RNA and RNP complexes in ap hysiological context. It is unknown how this discrimination between potential substrates is achieved. Here we show one possible way by which anon-sequence specific DExH/D protein can discriminately remodel similar RNA complexes. We have measured in vitro the disassembly of model RNPs by two distinct DExH/D proteins, DED1 and NPH-II. Both enzymes displace the U1 snRNP from at ightly bound RNA in an active, ATP-dependent fashion. However, DED1 cannot actively displace the protein U1A from its binding site, whereas NPH-II can. The dissociation rate of U1A dictates the rate by which DED1 remodels RNA complexes with U1A bound. We further show that DED1 disassembles RNA complexes with slightly altered U1A binding sites at different rates, but only when U1A is bound to the RNA. These findings suggest that the ''inability'' to actively displace other proteins from RNA can provide non-sequence specific DExH/D proteins with the capacity to disassemble similar RNA complexes in ad iscriminatory fashion. In addition, our study illuminates possible mechanisms for protein displacement by DExH/D proteins.