Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants robustly associated with complex traits. However, the biological mechanisms underlying these associations are, in general, not well understood. We propose a gene-based association method called PrediXcan that directly tests the molecular mechanisms through which genetic variation affects phenotype. The approach estimates the component of gene expression determined by an individual’s genetic profile and correlates the “imputed” gene expression with the phenotype under investigation to identify genes involved in the etiology of the phenotype. The genetically regulated gene expression is estimated using whole-genome tissue-dependent prediction models trained with reference transcriptome datasets. PrediXcan enjoys the benefits of gene-based approaches such as reduced multiple testing burden and a principled approach to the design of follow-up experiments. Our results demonstrate that PrediXcan can detect known and novel genes associated with disease traits and provide insights into the mechanism of these associations.

Importance With cure rates of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exceeding 85%, there is compelling need to mitigate treatment toxicities that can compromise quality of life. Peripheral neuropathy is the major dose-limiting toxicity of the microtubule inhibitor vincristine, an anticancer agent given to every child with ALL. Objective Identify genetic germline variants associated with the occurrence or severity of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in children with ALL. Design, Setting and Participants All patients had been enrolled in one of two prospective clinical trials for childhood ALL that included treatment with 36–39 doses of vincristine. Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis and vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy were assessed in all patients from whom DNA was available (n=321 patients); 222 patients (median age at 6.0 years, range 0.1–18.8 years) enrolled between 1994–1998 on the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital protocol Total XIIIB (St. Jude cohort) with toxicity followed through January 2001, and 99 patients (median age 11.4 years, range 3.0–23.8 years) enrolled between 2007–2010 on the Children’s Oncology Group protocol AALL0433 (COG cohort) with toxicity followed through May 2011. Human leukemia cells and induced pluripotent stem cell neurons were used to assess the effects of lower CEP72 expression on vincristine sensitivity. Exposures Treatment with vincristine at a dosage of 1.5 or 2.0 mg/m2 as a component of protocol directed chemotherapy for childhood ALL. Main Outcomes and Measures Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy was assessed at each clinic visit using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and prospectively graded as mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), serious/disabling (grade 3), or life-threatening (grade 4). Results Grade 2–4 vincristine-induced neuropathy during continuation therapy occurred in 28.8% of patients (n=64 of 222) in the St. Jude cohort and in 22.2% of patients (n=22 of 99) in the COG cohort. A SNP in the promoter region of the CEP72 gene, which encodes a centrosomal protein involved in microtubule formation, had a significant association with vincristine neuropathy (meta p =6.3 × 10−9). This SNP had a minor allele frequency of 37% (235/642), with 50 of 321 patients (16%, 95% CI 11.6%–19.5%) homozygous for the risk allele (TT at rs924607). Among patients with the high-risk CEP72 genotype (TT at rs924607), 28 of 50 patients (56%, 95% CI 41.2–70.0) developed at least one episode of grade 2–4 neuropathy, a higher rate than in patients with the CEP72 CC or CT genotype (58 of 271 patients; 21.4%, 95% CI 16.9–26.7); p=2.4×10−6. The severity (grade) of neuropathy was greater (2.4-fold by Poisson regression (p<0.0001), 2.7-fold based on mean grade of neuropathy (1.23 [95% CI 0.74 – 1.72] versus 0.45 [95% CI 0.3 – 0.6]; t test p=0.004)) in patients homozygous for the CEP72 risk allele (TT genotype), compared to patients with the CC or CT genotype. The CEP72 promoter SNP was show...

Purpose Cisplatin is widely used but highly ototoxic. Effects of cumulative cisplatin dose on hearing loss have not been comprehensively evaluated in survivors of adult-onset cancer. Patients and Methods Comprehensive audiological measures were conducted on 488 North American male germ cell tumor (GCT) survivors in relation to cumulative cisplatin dose, including audiograms (0.25 to 12 kHz), tests of middle ear function, and tinnitus. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria defined hearing loss severity. The geometric mean of hearing thresholds (0.25 to 12 kHz) summarized overall hearing status consistent with audiometric guidelines. Patients were sorted into quartiles of hearing thresholds of age- and sex-matched controls. Results Increasing cumulative cisplatin dose (median, 400 mg/m2; range, 200 to 800 mg/m2) was significantly related to hearing loss at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 kHz (P trends, .021 to < .001): every 100 mg/m2 increase resulted in a 3.2-dB impairment in age-adjusted overall hearing threshold (4 to 12 kHz; P < .001). Cumulative cisplatin doses > 300 mg/m2 were associated with greater American Speech-Language-Hearing Association–defined hearing loss severity (odds ratio, 1.59; P = .0066) and worse normative-matched quartiles (odds ratio, 1.33; P = .093) compared with smaller doses. Almost one in five (18%) patients had severe to profound hearing loss. Tinnitus (40% patients) was significantly correlated with reduced hearing at each frequency (P < .001). Noise-induced damage (10% patients) was unaffected by cisplatin dose (P = .59). Hypertension was significantly related (P = .0066) to overall hearing threshold (4 to 12 kHz) in age- and cisplatin dose–adjusted analyses. Middle ear deficits occurred in 22.3% of patients but, as expected, were not related to cytotoxic drug dosage. Conclusion Follow-up of adult-onset cancer survivors given cisplatin should include routine inquiry for hearing status and tinnitus, referral to audiologists as clinically indicated, and hypertension control. Patients should be urged to avoid noise exposure, ototoxic drugs, and other factors that further damage hearing.