Targeted temperature management has become a standard of care in many intensive care settings. The role of nursing is critical as we consider the use of these new approaches to maintaining temperature control and inducing hypothermia in our patient populations. Indeed, the successful use of various new cooling devices many times falls on the nursing staff to maintain strict guidelines for use as well as troubleshooting problems. A series of state-of-the-art lectures presented at the 2014 Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management meeting in Miami brought together several experts to discuss their experiences with utilizing therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management strategies at their institutions and hospitals. Dr. Justin Lundbye, chief of cardiology at the Hospital of Central Connecticut, moderated this session. Mr. Mark Adams, Virginia Health System, University of Virginia, discussed collaborative efforts for the use of therapeutic hypothermia on injured patients. A major point of discussion was whether therapeutic hypothermia medicine is a nurse's therapy. Dr. Kelly Sawyer, Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont School of Medicine, discussed targeted temperature management and out-ofhospital cardiac arrest in survivors undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. Ms. Deborah Klein, Cleveland Clinic, spoke on therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest and strategies for a successful program. Specific issues discussed included steps in the implementation of a therapeutic hypothermia program as well as strategies for changing clinical behavior. A team approach in terms of recruiting members to work together as well as emphasizing various methods for cooling were discussed. Based on the information presented during this roundtable discussion, it is clear that therapeutic hypothermia is being used, and a growing number of different types of caregivers are responsible for the successful implementation of the programs and beneficial results.Question: When you were going over your talk, some of your inclusion criteria were witnessed cardiac arrest, and it included VFib and pulseless VTach. I just recently rewrote the order sets for all seven of our hospitals. I removed that as an inclusion criterion because I didn't want to come across a physician who says, ''Oh, it is a pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and now we have ROSC [return of spontaneous circulation],'' but that didn't meet the criteria. So I am curious as to why you have VFib (VF) and pulseless VTach (VT) other than that's what the literature supports.Ms. Deborah Klein: When working with new hospitals that have never used therapeutic hypothermia before, I have found it easier to start off with the things that are very clear and are supported by the American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines. We include in our protocol to consider therapeutic hypothermia for asystole, PEA, and for in-hospital cardiac arrest. We don't want to limit therapeutic hypothermia to just the patients we know benefit (witness...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.