Short-term correction of metabolic acidosis in normal and uremic subjects has been shown to decrease protein degradation, but the long-term effects of better correction of acidosis on nutrition in ESRF are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the possible benefits, in the nutritional state and morbidity, of improved correction of acidosis in the first year of treatment with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Two hundred consecutive new CAPD patients were randomized, in a single-blind fashion, to receive a high (HA; lactate 40 mmol/liter) or low (LA; lactate 35 mmol/liter) alkali dialysate for one year. Calcium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate were also used to correct acidosis in the HA group. At one year, the venous serum bicarbonate and arterial pH were 7.44 +/- 0.004 and 27.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter in the HA group, and 23.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter and 7.4 +/- 0.004 in the LA group (P < 0.001). Dialysis dose, at one year or at the point of leaving the study (HA 8.0 +/- 0.1 liters/day vs. LA 8.5 +/- 0.3 liters/day) was not significantly different (P = 0.18). At one year, the increase in body weight in the HA group (6.1 +/- 0.66 kg) was higher than in the LA group (3.71 +/- 0.56 kg, P < 0.05). The increase in midarm circumference in the HA patients (1.26 +/- 0.16 cm) was significantly higher than the increase in the LA patients (0.61 +/- 0.16 cm, P < 0.05). The increase in triceps skinfold thickness were not significantly different (HA 2.5 +/- 0.41 mm vs. LA 1.24 +/- 0.38 mm, P = 0.1). Serum albumin was 37.8 +/- 0.4 g/dl at one year in the HA group, and 38.2 +/- 0.5 g/dl in the LA group (NS). Dietary protein intake at one year (HA 0.9 +/- 0.2 g/kg/day vs. LA 1.0 +/- 0.1 g/kg/day) was not significantly different. There were fewer hospital admissions in the HA group (1.13 +/- 0.16 per patient per year) compared to the LA group (1.71 +/- 0.22 per patient per year, P < 0.05). The HA patients spent less days in hospital per year than the LA patients (16.4 +/- 1.4 days/year vs. 21.2 +/- 1.9 days/year; P < 0.05). It is concluded that better correction of metabolic acidosis leads to greater increases in body weight and midarm circumference, but not triceps skinfold thickness, in the first year of CAPD. The improvement in morbidity, in terms of number of admissions and days in hospital per year, may be associated with the improvement in nutritional state.
Use of the 6.5 Fr sheathless guide catheter system, which has an outer diameter <5 Fr sheath, as the default system in routine PCI is feasible with a high rate of procedural success via the radial artery.
Background Patient experience of nursing care is associated with safety, care quality, treatment outcomes, costs and service use. Effective nursing care includes meeting patients’ fundamental physical, relational and psychosocial needs, which may be compromised by the challenges of SARS-CoV-2. No evidence-based nursing guidelines exist for patients with SARS-CoV-2. We report work to develop such a guideline. Our aim was to identify views and experiences of nursing staff on necessary nursing care for inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 (not invasively ventilated) that is omitted or delayed (missed care) and any barriers to this care. Methods We conducted an online mixed methods survey structured according to the Fundamentals of Care Framework. We recruited a convenience sample of UK-based nursing staff who had nursed inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 not invasively ventilated. We asked respondents to rate how well they were able to meet the needs of SARS-CoV-2 patients, compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 patients, in 15 care categories; select from a list of barriers to care; and describe examples of missed care and barriers to care. We analysed quantitative data descriptively and qualitative data using Framework Analysis, integrating data in side-by-side comparison tables. Results Of 1062 respondents, the majority rated mobility, talking and listening, non-verbal communication, communicating with significant others, and emotional wellbeing as worse for patients with SARS-CoV-2. Eight barriers were ranked within the top five in at least one of the three care areas. These were (in rank order): wearing Personal Protective Equipment, the severity of patients’ conditions, inability to take items in and out of isolation rooms without donning and doffing Personal Protective Equipment, lack of time to spend with patients, lack of presence from specialised services e.g. physiotherapists, lack of knowledge about SARS-CoV-2, insufficient stock, and reluctance to spend time with patients for fear of catching SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions Our respondents identified nursing care areas likely to be missed for patients with SARS-CoV-2, and barriers to delivering care. We are currently evaluating a guideline of nursing strategies to address these barriers, which are unlikely to be exclusive to this pandemic or the environments represented by our respondents. Our results should, therefore, be incorporated into global pandemic planning.
The literature shows that many complications including psychosocial, sexual and economic are associated with dialysis. However few studies have been conducted from the patients' perspective or have examined the pre-dialysis phase of established renal failure. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of pre-dialysis patients. Ten patients were interviewed, on one occasion, prior to starting dialysis. The interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner in accordance with pre-defined interview topics. The findings of the study highlighted that participants had no clear expectations of dialysis treatment and generally expressed a sense of fatalism and lack of knowledge. This was highlighted by the main emergent theme, response to information. It became clear that most of the patients had received information, but had either misinterpreted, or been unable to absorb it. A number of specific issues including provision, quantity, interpretation and the timing of information appeared to be linked to the participants' inability to gain knowledge. These study findings highlight the importance of a patient centred, flexible education programme to enable patients to absorb and accurately interpret information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.