Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training involves low-weight exercises performed under vascular occlusion via an inflatable cuff. For patients who cannot tolerate high-load exercises, BFR training reportedly provides the benefits of high-load regimens, with the advantage of less tissue and joint stress. Hypothesis: Low-load BFR training is safe and efficacious for strengthening muscle groups proximal, distal, and contralateral to tourniquet placement in the lower extremities. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Level of Evidence: Level 1. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial of healthy participants completing a standardized 6-week course of BFR training. Patients were randomized to BFR training on 1 extremity or to a control group. Patients were excluded for cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic disease; pregnancy; or previous surgery in the extremity. Data collected at baseline and completion included limb circumferences and strength testing. Results: The protocol was completed by 26 patients, providing 16 BFR and 10 control patients (mean patient age, 27 years; 62% female). A statistically greater increase in strength was seen proximal and distal to the BFR tourniquet when compared with both the nontourniquet extremity and the control group ( P < 0.05). Approximately twice the improvement was seen in the BFR group compared with controls. Isokinetic testing showed greater increases in knee extension peak torque (3% vs 11%), total work (6% vs 15%), and average power (4% vs 12%) for the BFR group ( P < 0.04). Limb circumference significantly increased in both the thigh (0.8% vs 3.5%) and the leg (0.4% vs 2.8%) compared with the control group ( P < 0.01). Additionally, a significant increase occurred in thigh girth (0.8% vs 2.3%) and knee extension strength (3% vs 8%) in the nontourniquet BFR extremity compared with the control group ( P < 0.05). There were no reported adverse events. Conclusion: Low-load BFR training led to a greater increase in muscle strength and limb circumference. BFR training had similar strengthening effects on both proximal and distal muscle groups. Gains in the contralateral extremity may corroborate a systemic or crossover effect. Clinical Relevance: BFR training strengthens muscle groups proximal, distal, and contralateral to cuff placement. Patients undergoing therapy for various orthopaedic conditions may benefit from low-load BFR training with the advantage of less tissue stress.

No abstract

Objectives: Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy consists of low-intensity exercise performed under reduced venous return due to an inflatable tourniquet. This produces similar physiologic and clinical effects to high-intensity routines with less joint and tissue stress. Postoperative patients may benefit from more efficient rehabilitation. Proximal and distal effects of BFR have been evaluated, however, minimal literature exists on its use in orthopaedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of low-intensity BFR therapy both proximal and distal, in the upper and lower extremities. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of healthy subjects completing a standardized 6-week course of BFR therapy. Subjects were randomized to BFR therapy on one extremity or to a control group. Subjects were excluded for cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic disease, pregnancy, or previous surgery in the extremity. Data collected at baseline and completion included: limb circumferences, isokinetic, and manual strength testing. Results: Forty subjects completed the protocol. Average age was 27.7 years; 54% were female. For both upper and lower extremity groups, a statistically significant increase was observed in manual and isokinetic strength both proximal and distal to the BFR tourniquet when compared to both the non-tourniquet extremity and the control group (p<0.05). Limb circumference significantly increased in the upper (p<0.01) and lower extremities (p=0.02). A significant increase in manual strength was noted in shoulder abduction and scaption, and hip extension and abduction even in the non-tourniquet BFR extremity compared to the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Low-intensity BFR therapy led to greater increases in muscle strength and hypertrophy. Similar strengthening effects were seen in proximal and distal muscle groups. Strength increases in the contralateral BFR extremity may corroborate a systemic effect. This study provides data to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of BFR therapy in operative and non-operative orthopaedic conditions. [Table: see text]

No abstract