Background: Although the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is often missed, outcomes from surgical intervention significantly improve patient satisfaction. This article seeks to highlight patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, and both short and long-term outcomes of thoracic outlet decompression in the adolescent population. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients between the ages of 13 and 21 years with a clinical diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) who were treated surgically between 2000 and 2015 was performed. Data points including preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative findings were collected. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire (CBSQ), and NTOS index, were obtained for a cohort of patients with follow-up ranging from 2 to 15 years. Results: The study population consisted of 54 patients involving 61 extremities. The most common procedures included neurolysis of the supraclavicular brachial plexus (60, 98.4%), anterior scalenectomy (59, 96.7%), and middle scalenectomy (54, 88.5%). First rib resection (FRR) was performed in 28 patients (45.9%). Long-term outcomes were collected for 24 (44%) of 54 patients with an average follow-up of 69.5 months (range, 24-180 months). The average VAS improved from 7.5 preoperatively to 1.8 postoperatively. The average SANE increased from 28.9 preoperatively to 85.4 postoperatively. The average postoperative scores were 11.4 for the QuickDASH, 27.4 for the CBSQ, and 17.2 for the NTOS index. Subgroup analysis of patients having FRR (28, 45.9%) demonstrated no difference in clinical outcome measures compared with patients who did not have FRR. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of NTOS in adolescent patients has favorable intermediate and long-term outcomes.

Background Heterotopic pregnancy occurs when two pregnancies occur simultaneously in the uterus and an ectopic location. Treatment includes removal of the ectopic pregnancy with preservation of the intrauterine pregnancy. Treatment is done laparoscopically with either a Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) or a multiport laparoscopic surgery. Case We present a case of a first trimester heterotopic pregnancy in a 42-year-old gravida 5, para 0-1-3-1 female with previous history of left salpingectomy, who underwent laparoscopic right salpingectomy and lysis of adhesions (LOA) via Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS). Conclusion Although LESS for benign OB/GYN cases is feasible, safe, and equally effective compared to the conventional laparoscopic techniques, studies have suggested no clinically relevant advantages in the frequency of perioperative complications between LESS and conventional methods. No data on the cost effectiveness of LESS versus conventional methods are available. LESS utilizes only one surgical incision which may lead to decreased pain and better cosmetic outcome when compared to multiport procedure. One significant undesirable aspect of LESS is the crowding of the surgical area as only one incision is made. Therefore, all instruments go through one port, which can lead to obstruction of the surgeon's vision and in some cases higher rate of procedure failure resulting in conversion to multiport procedure.

No abstract

Objectives: Thoracic outlet syndrome represents a complex combination of symptoms in the upper extremity that occurs due to compression of the neurovascular structures of the thoracic outlet or subcoracoid space. It can be seen in overhead athletes and is commonly misdiagnosed as other shoulder pathology. This study seeks to highlight patient characteristics, intraoperative findings, and both short term and long term outcomes of thoracic outlet decompression in the adolescent population as well as a comparison of outcomes by mechanism of injury including athletes. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients between the ages of 13 and 21 with a clinical diagnosis of TOS that were treated surgically by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2015. Data points including preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative findings were collected. In addition, patient reported outcome scores including quickDASH, CBSQ, VAS, and SANE were obtained for a cohort of patients with long-term follow up ranging from 2 to 15 years. Results: The study population consisted of 54 adolescents (61 extremities) aged 13-21 at the time of presentation. There was a 3:1 female to male ratio. Patients saw an average of 2.08 other healthcare providers before referral to our institution. The most common surgical procedures included neurolysis of the brachial plexus (60; 98.4%), anterior scalenectomy (59; 96.7%), middle scalenectomy (54; 88.5%), excision of the first rib (28; 45.9%), excision of cervical rib (5; 8.2%), and subclavian artery manipulation (50, 81.9%). A second incision in the subcoracoid space was utilized in 28 (45.9%) extremities for exploration of the infraclavicular brachial plexus with release of the coracocostal ligament in 26 of these 28 patients (92.9%). Long-term follow-up data, including patient reported outcomes, was collected for 24/54 patients (44%). In this patient subset, the average follow-up was 69.5 months and ranged from 24 months to 180 months. The average preoperative VAS was recorded at 8.2 with an average postoperative VAS of 2.0, showing an improvement of 6.2 points. The average preoperative SANE score was 28.9 and the average postoperative SANE score was 85.4 with an improvement in 56.5. The average postoperative quickDASH score was 11.4. The average postoperative CBSQ score was 27.4 . The average postoperative NTOS Index score was 17.2. Subgroup analysis was performed analyzing patients having a first rib excision versus patients where their first rib was left intact. There was no difference regarding clinical outcome measures in these groups including CBSQ, VAS, SANE score, quick DASH and NTOS index. An additional subgroup analysis was performed comparing mechanism of injury including overuse from sports, trauma, and idiopathic causes. There was also no difference regarding clinical outcome measures in these groups including CBSQ, VAS, SANE score, quick DASH and NTOS index. Conclusion: We found no difference in clinical outcome scores in patients treated with rib resection versus patients with the first rib left intact. We also found no difference in outcomes with respect to mechanism of injury including overhead sports athletes. Overall, patients did well long-term after decompression of the thoracic outlet. Thoracic outlet syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of athletes with upper extremity pain especially if they have neurologic findings.