Background Up to 30% of patients admitted to hospitals with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), experience major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including new/worsening heart failure, new/worsening arrhythmia, and/or myocardial infarction. Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) is the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogen among CAP patients and the only etiological agent linked independently to MACE. Nevertheless, no clinical data exists identifying which serotypes of Spn are principally responsible for MACE. Methods This was an observational multicenter retrospective study conducted through the Public Health Secretary of Bogotá, Colombia. We included patients with a confirmed clinical diagnosis of IPD with record of pneumococcal serotyping and clinical information between 2012 and 2019. Spn were serotyped using the quellung method by the National Center of Microbiology. MACE were determined by a retrospective chart review. Results The prevalence of MACE was 23% (71/310) in IPD patients; 28% (53/181) in patients admitted for CAP. The most prevalent S. pneumoniae serotype identified in our study was the 19A, responsible for the 13% (42/310) of IPD in our cohort, of which 21% (9/42) presented MACE. Serotypes independently associated with MACE in IPD patients were serotype 3 (OR 1, 48; 95% CI [1.21-2.27]; p=0.013) and serotype 9n (OR 1.29; 95% CI [1.08-2.24]; p=0.020). Bacteremia occurred in 87% of patients with MACE. Moreover, serum concentrations of C-reactive protein were elevated in patients with MACE versus in non-MACE patients (mean [SD], 138 [145] versus 73 [106], p=0.01). Conclusions MACE are common during IPD with serotype 3 and 9n independently of frequency.
Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) is a public health problem. AMR is a concerning problem in Gram-negative bacteria such are Enterobacterales, which are frequently carbapenem-resistant pathogens (CRP), and few therapeutic options are available. However, scarce data is known regarding the clinical, molecular characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant pathogens in LMICs. Thus, this study will attempt to bring novel data in these regards. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in two reference hospitals in Colombia, South America. All consecutive patients infected with CRPs between 2017 and 2021 were included. Clinical data were gathered by retrospective chart review. Bacterial pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility were prospectively identified and stored by each hospital. Molecular characterization was performed by PCR in isolated bacteria. Results A total of 220 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 60.6 (18.4) years, and 32% (71/220) were female. The most frequently identified CRPs were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (85/220, 39%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (81/220, 37%). CRPs were most frequently identified in urine, blood, and respiratory samples (Figure 1). Community-acquired infections were frequently diagnosed in patients infected with CRPs in our study (73% [161/220]), and most of the patients were admitted to the ICU (163/220, 74%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 28% (62/220) and 38% (62/163) in ICU admitted patients. PCR was carried out in 105 CRP; KPC (69%, 73/105) and VIM (37%, 39/105) were the most frequently identified mechanisms. Of the K. pneumoniae isolates with PCR assessment, 94% (33/35) had KPC and 3% (1/35) had VIM. In contrast, in P. aeruginosa isolates with PCR assessment, 53% (29/54) had KPC and 59% (32/54) had VIM. Seven (13%) patients infected with P. aeruginosa had both KPC and VIM genes identified. Conclusion The most frequently identified carbapenem-resistant pathogens in these two Colombian reference hospitals were P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae, with high mortality rates. KPC was the most commonly identified mechanism of carbapenem resistance in our cohort. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.