Objective-One might speculate that radiologists who enjoy mammography may exhibit better performance than radiologists who do not.Materials and Methods-One hundred thirty-one radiologists at three Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries completed a survey about their characteristics, clinical practices, and attitudes related to screening mammography. Survey results were linked with BCSC performance data for 662,084 screening and 33,977 diagnostic mammograms. Using logistic regression, we modeled the odds of an abnormal interpretation, cancer detection, sensitivity, and specificity among radiologists who reported they enjoy interpreting screening mammograms compared with those who do not.Results-Overall, 44.3% of radiologists reported not enjoying interpreting screening mammograms. Radiologists who reported enjoying interpreting screening mammograms were more likely to be women, spend at least 20% of their time in breast imaging, have a primary academic affiliation, read more than 2,000 mammograms per year, and be salaried. Enjoyment was not associated with screening mammography performance. Among diagnostic mammograms, there was a significant increase in sensitivity among radiologists who reported enjoyment (85.2%) compared with those who did not (78.2%). In models adjusting for radiologist characteristics, similar trends were found; however, no statistically significant associations remained.Conclusion-Almost one half of radiologists actively interpreting mammograms do not enjoy that part of their job. Once we adjusted for radiologist and patient characteristics, we found that reported enjoyment was not related to performance in our study, although suggestive trends were noted. Keywordsbreast cancer screening; breast imaging specialists; mammographers; practice of radiology; radiologists; screening mammography Address correspondence to B. M. Geller (berta.geller@uvm.edu). NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript AJR Am J Roentgenol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 February 18. Published in final edited form as:AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 February ; 192(2): 361-369. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1647. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptThe declining numbers of radiologists willing to provide mammography services [1][2][3] and the increasing evidence suggesting wide variability in their performance [4,5] raised the question of whether mammography performance is associated with radiologists' enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms. Given the negative incentives for joining the breast imaging field [6], one might speculate that radiologists who enjoy mammography are more likely to remain in the field and may exhibit better performance than radiologists who do not. However, we know of no studies that have tested this idea.Radiologists in general are satisfied with their professional choice of specialty, with 93% reporting that they enjoy their career [7]. In the single published study on career satisfaction related to mammography, Lewis et al. [8] reported t...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.