Cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) is one of the seven global regulators in Escherichia coli, which regulates the expression of over 490 genes. It contains a cAMP binding N-terminal domain and a DNA binding C-terminal domain, connected via a short hinge region. Various stress-tolerant E. coli mutants had been obtained through transcriptional engineering of CRP. This review aims to shed some light on the possible mechanism behind these CRP variants, from the change in CRP structure, transcription profile, and DNA binding affinity. The amino acid substitutions are distributed along the protein-certain mutations have shown higher frequency than others, such as T127N and D138Y. β-Galactosidase reporter gene assay revealed that CRP mutants had lower binding affinity with all three classes of CRP-dependent promoters as compared to native CRP, which probably would change cellular transcription profile. Different CRP mutants would induce different cellular transcription profile in E. coli, but there are common genes differentially expressed in these variants, including upregulated gadAB and downregulated nontransporter genes aspA and tnaA, and transporter/poringenes malE, mglB, cstA, and lamB. We believe that transcriptional engineering of CRP can provide an alternative strain engineering method for E. coli and its detailed mechanism may need further investigations.

The limited isobutanol tolerance of Escherichia coli is a major drawback during fermentative isobutanol production. Different from classical strain engineering approaches, this work was initiated to improve E. coli isobutanol tolerance from its transcriptional level by engineering its global transcription factor cAMP receptor protein (CRP). Random mutagenesis libraries were generated by error-prone PCR of crp, and the libraries were subjected to isobutanol stress for selection. Variant IB2 (S179P, H199R) was isolated and exhibited much better growth (0.18 h(-1) ) than the control (0.05 h(-1) ) in 1.2% (v/v) isobutanol (9.6 g/L). Genome-wide DNA microarray analysis revealed that 58 and 308 genes in IB2 had differential expression (>2-fold, p < 0.05) in the absence and presence of 1% (v/v) isobutanol, respectively. When challenged with isobutanol, genes related to acid resistance (gadABCE, hdeABD), nitrate reduction (narUZYWV), flagella and fimbrial activity (lfhA, yehB, ycgR, fimCDF), and sulfate reduction and transportation (cysIJH, cysC, cysN) were the major functional groups that were up-regulated, whereas most of the down-regulated genes were enzyme (tnaA) and transporters (proVWX, manXYZ). As demonstrated by single-gene knockout experiments, gadX, nirB, rhaS, hdeB, and ybaS were found associated with strain isobutanol resistance. The intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in IB2 was only half of that of the control when facing stress, indicating that IB2 can withstand toxic isobutanol much better than the control.

No abstract

No abstract