Background
Fetal ultrasound organ screening has become a standard of care in most high-income countries. This has resulted in increased detection of congenital abnormalities, which may lead to major uncertainty and anxiety in expectant parents, even though many of them are of minor relevance. In order to optimize prenatal counselling, we introduced an interdisciplinary approach for all pregnant women referred to our center by private obstetricians for a co-assessment of suspected relevant fetal abnormalities of the kidney or urinary tract, involving both experienced prenatal ultrasound specialists and a pediatric nephrologist or urologist.
Methods
In a retrospective analysis, we evaluated reports of intrauterine evaluation and postnatal follow-up in order to assess accuracy of explicit intrauterine diagnoses and outcome of hydronephroses according to their severity in this setting.
Results
A total of 175 fetuses were examined between 2012 and 2019 and followed postnatally at our Pediatric Nephrology or Urology Department. There was a high concordance (85.9%) between explicit intrauterine and final diagnoses. Resolution rate of hydronephrosis was higher in patients with intrauterine low-grade than high-grade hydronephrosis (61.8% versus 11.9%). An etiological diagnosis was found in 62.5%, 52.0%, and 11.1% of patients with intrauterine bilateral high-grade, unilateral high-grade, and unilateral high-grade with contralateral low-grade hydronephrosis, respectively, but in none of the patients with intrauterine low-grade hydronephrosis.
Conclusions
The results of our study demonstrate that, through interdisciplinary teamwork, intrauterine assessment of the fetal kidneys and urinary tract is highly accurate and allows a good discrimination between relevant and transient/physiological hydronephroses.
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The Fetal Medicine Foundation(FMF) London developed a first trimester combined screening algorithm for preterm preeclampsia(pPE) that allows a significantly higher detection of pregnancies at risk compared to conventional screening by maternal risk factors only. The aim of this trial is to validate this screening model in the Swiss population in order to implement this screening into routine first trimester ultrasound and to prescribe low dose aspirin 150mg(LDA) in patients at risk for pPE. Therefore, a multicentre registry study collecting screening and pregnancy outcome data was initiated in2020;these are the preliminary results.
Methods
Between June1st2020 and May31st2021 we included singleton pregnancies with pPE screening at the hospitals of Basel, Lucerne and Bern. Multiple of Medians(MoMs) of uterine artery pulsatility index(UtA-PI), mean arterial pressure(MAP), placental growth factor(PlGF) and pregnancy associated plasma protein A(PAPP-A) as well as risks were analysed as calculated by each centre’s software and recalculated on the FMF online calculator for comparative reasons. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Version9.1.
Results
During the study period 1027patients with singleton pregnancies were included. 174(16.9%) had a risk>1:100 at first trimester combined screening. Combining the background risk, MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF only, the cut-off to obtain a SPR of 11% is≥1:75. Outcomes were available for 968/1027(94.3%) patients, 951 resulted in live birth. 15(1.58%) developed classical PE, 23(2.42%) developed PE according to the ISSHP(International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy) definition.
Conclusion
First trimester combined screening for PE and prevention with LDA results in a low prevalence of PE.The screening algorithm performs according to expectations, however the cut-off of>1:100 results in a SPR above the accepted range and a cut-off of≥1:75 should be considered for screening. More data are needed to evaluate, if these results are representative for the general Swiss population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.