Anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL that respects the distal femoral physis in skeletally immature patients is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of patellofemoral instability and allows patients to return to sports without redislocation of the patella.

No abstract

D. Dejour's classification is valid for typing trochlear dysplasia and is particularly useful in separating low-grade from high-grade dysplasia.

Conventional treatment of mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis consists of fixation in situ with wires or screws. Recent contributions to the literature suggest that even a mild slip may lead to early damage of the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage by abutment of a prominent femoral metaphysis. It has been suggested that the appropriate treatment in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis should not only prevent further slipping of the epiphysis, but also address potential femoroacetabular impingement by restoring the anatomy of the proximal femur. Between October 1984 and December 1995 we treated 16 patients for unilateral mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis by fixation in situ with Kirschner wires. In this study we have reviewed these patients for clinical and radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement. There was little clinical indication of impingement but radiological evaluation assessing the femoral head-neck ratio and measuring the Nötzli alpha angle on the anteroposterior and cross-table radiographs showed significant alterations in the proximal femur. None of the affected hips had a normal head-neck ratio and the mean alpha angle was 86 degrees (55 degrees to 99 degrees ) and 55 degrees (40 degrees to 94 degrees ) on the anteroposterior and lateral cross-table radiographs, respectively. While our clinical data favours conventional treatment, our radiological findings are in support of restoring the anatomy of the proximal femur to avoid or delay the development of femoroacetabular impingement following mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Failure to consider additional risk factors, technical intra-operative errors and inappropriate patient selection were identified as reasons for revision surgery after MPFL reconstruction. Identifying the potential causes of failure can help to treat and possibly prevent future complications.