Cancers emerge from an on-going Darwinian evolutionary process, often leading to multiple competing subclones within a single primary tumour1-4. This evolutionary process culminates in the formation of metastases, which is the cause of 90% of cancer-related deaths5. However, despite its clinical importance, little is known about the principles governing the dissemination of cancer cells to distant organs. Although the hypothesis that each metastasis originates from a single tumour cell is generally supported6-8, recent studies using mouse models of cancer demonstrated the existence of polyclonal seeding from and inter-clonal cooperation between multiple subclones9,10. In this study, we sought definitive evidence for the existence of polyclonal seeding in human malignancy and to establish the clonal relationship among different metastases in the context of androgen-deprived metastatic prostate cancer. Using whole genome sequencing, we characterised multiple metastases arising from prostate tumours in ten patients. Integrated analyses of subclonal architecture revealed the patterns of metastatic spread in unprecedented detail. Metastasis-to-metastasis spread was found to be common, either through de novo monoclonal seeding of daughter metastases or, in five cases, through the transfer of multiple tumour clones between metastatic sites. Lesions affecting tumour suppressor genes usually occur as single events, whereas mutations in genes involved in androgen receptor signalling commonly involve multiple, convergent events in different metastases. Our results elucidate in detail the complex patterns of metastatic spread and further our understanding of the development of resistance to androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer.

Word count abstract: 293Word count text: 2592 This is the accepted manuscript of the article, which has been published in European Urology. 2019, 75(4), 667-675. http://dx. AbstractBackground: Several systemic therapeutic options exist for metastatic castratesensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can molecularly profile metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and can influence decision-making, but remains untested in mCSPC. Objective:To determine ctDNA abundance at de novo mCSPC diagnosis and whether ctDNA provides complementary clinically-relevant information to a prostate biopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants:We collected plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 53 newly diagnosed patients with mCSPC and, where possible, during treatment.Targeted sequencing was performed on cfDNA and DNA from diagnostic prostate tissue. Results and Limitations:Median ctDNA fraction was 11% (range 0-84) among untreated patients but lower (1.0%, range 0-51) in patients after short term (median 22 days) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). TP53 mutations and DNA repair defects were identified in 47% and 21% of the cohort, respectively. Concordance for mutation detection in matched samples was 80%. Combined ctDNA and tissue analysis identified potential driver alterations in 94% of patients, whereas ctDNA or prostate biopsy alone was insufficient in 19 cases (36%). Limitations include the use of a narrow gene panel and undersampling of primary disease by prostate biopsy.Conclusions: ctDNA provides additional information to a prostate biopsy in men with de novo mCSPC, but ADT rapidly reduces ctDNA availability. Primary tissue and ctDNA share relevant somatic alterations, suggesting that either are suitable for molecular subtyping in de novo mCSPC. The optimal approach for biomarker development should ! 3 utilize both a tissue and liquid biopsy at diagnosis, as neither captures clinically-relevant somatic alterations in all patients. Patient summary:In men with advanced prostate cancer, tumour DNA shed into the bloodstream can be measured by a blood test. The information from this test provides complementary information to a prostate needle biopsy and could be used to guide management strategies.! 4

AR-V3, AR-V7 and AR-V9 are co-expressed in CRPC metastases highlighting the fact that inhibiting AR function via regions common to all AR-Vs is likely to provide additional benefit to patients with CRPC.