Chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) contributes to cardiac remodeling and the transition to heart failure (HF). Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) may ameliorate this damage by improving renal function and sympathetic cardioregulation in hypertensive HF patients with renal injury. The efficacy may be comparable to that of chronic β-blocker treatment. Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats were subjected to RDN in the hypertrophic stage. Another group of Dahl rats were subjected to sham operations and treated chronically with vehicle (CONT) or β-blocker bisoprolol (BISO). Neither RDN nor BISO altered the blood pressure; however, BISO significantly reduced the heart rate (HR). Both RDN and BISO significantly prolonged survival (22.2 and 22.4 weeks, respectively) compared with CONT (18.3 weeks). Echocardiography revealed reduced left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and improved LV function, and histological analysis demonstrated the amelioration of LV myocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis in the RDN and BISO rats at the HF stage. Tyrosine hydroxylase and β1-adrenergic receptor (ADR) expression levels in the LV myocardium significantly increased only in the RDN rats, whereas the α1b-, α1d- and α2c-ADR expression levels increased only in the BISO rats. In both groups, renal damage and dysfunction were also reduced, and this reduction was accompanied by the suppression of endothelin-1, renin and angiotensin-converting enzyme mRNAs. RDN ameliorated the progression of both myocardial and renal damage in the hypertensive rats independent of blood pressure changes. The overall effects were similar to those of β-receptor blockade with favorable effects on HR and α-ADR expression. These findings may be associated with the restoration of the myocardial SNS and renal protection.

The effects of chronic blockade of vasopressin type 1a receptors (V1aR) and the additive effects of a type 2 receptor (V2R) antagonist on the treatment of hypertension-induced heart failure and renal injury remain to be unknown. In this study, Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats were chronically treated with a vehicle (CONT), a V1aR antagonist (OPC21268; OPC), a V2R antagonist (tolvaptan; TOLV), or a combination of OPC21268 and tolvaptan (OPC/TOLV) from the pre-hypertrophic stage (6 weeks). No treatment altered blood pressure during the study. Significant improvements were seen in median survival for the OPC and TOLV, and the OPC/TOLV showed a further improvement in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Echocardiography showed suppressed left ventricular hypertrophy in the OPC and OPC/TOLV at 11 weeks with improved function in all treatment groups by 17 weeks. In all treatment groups, improvements were seen in the following: myocardial histological changes, creatinine clearance, urinary albumin excretion, and renal histopathologic damage. Also, key mRNA levels were suppressed (eg, endothelin-1 and collagen). In conclusion, chronic V1aR blockade ameliorated disease progression in this rat model, with additive benefits from the combination of V1aR and V2R antagonists. It was associated with protection of both myocardial and renal damage, independent of blood pressure.

Background Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been reported, and the underlying reason remains poorly understood. Therefore, the relationship between angiographic measurements and FFR was evaluated, and predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary artery stenosis were determined. Methods Consecutive 314 patients (405 lesions) with a lesion of 30–80% angiographic diameter stenosis who underwent invasive FFR were recruited. The myocardial area supplied by the coronary artery distal to the stenosis was evaluated using a modified version of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) score. Participants underwent follow-up, and major cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization were recorded. Results Although % diameter stenosis was correlated with FFR (R = 0.279, P < 0.001), diameter stenosis-FFR mismatch was observed in 37.8% of the lesions. Although FFR values were not associated with clinical factors, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, it was correlated with minimal lumen diameter (MLD), diffuse lesion, presence of proximal lesion, and BARI score. In addition, the lesions in left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery showed low FFR values compared with those in the left circumflex coronary artery or right coronary artery. In multivariate logistic analysis, MLD (β coefficient = 0.330), diffuse lesion (β coefficient = –0.266), proximal lesion (β coefficient = –0.144), BARI score (β coefficient = –0.219), and LAD lesion (β coefficient = –0.293) were all independent predictors for FFR value. The estimated FFR value based on these factors showed smaller mismatch and higher sensitivity. No difference was observed in the event rates for MACE and MI or revascularization between the FFR-guided and estimated FFR-guided strategies. Conclusions MLD, diffuse lesion, proximal lesion, BARI score, and lesion vessel were independent predictors for FFR in intermediate coronary stenosis. Not only the extent of local lesion stenosis but also the amount of myocardial supply and the lesion location may determine the physiological significance and explain the visual–functional mismatch. The estimation of FFR by these factors may be useful in clinical practice.

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is used for assessing the hemodynamic severity of a lesion, as an alternative to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). We evaluated the relationship between iFR and FFR in detail and the clinical significance of iFR in patients with mild to intermediate coronary artery stenosis. We recruited consecutive 323 patients (421 lesions) with lesions exhibiting 30% to 80% diameter stenosis on angiography in whom FFR and iFR were measured. In the total lesions, mean diameter stenosis was 48.6% ± 9.0%, and physiological significance, defined by FFR of 0.80 or less or by iFR of 0.92 or less, was observed in 32.5% or 33.5%, respectively. Mismatch between iFR and FFR was observed in 18.1% of the lesions. Clinical factors did not predict FFR value; however, gender, diabetes mellitus, aortic stenosis, anemia, high-sensitivity CRP value, and renal function predicted iFR value. In multivariate logistic analysis after adjustment for FFR value, gender (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.005), aortic stenosis (p = 0.016), high-sensitivity CRP (p < 0.001), and renal function (p = 0.003) were all independent predictors of iFR value. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the baseline iFR predicted the subsequent major cardiovascular events (MACE) (hazard ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16-4.93; p = 0.018) and the results of the iFR-guided strategy for predicting rates of MACE and myocardial infarction/revascularization were superior to those of the FFR-guided strategy. In conclusion, significant clinical factors predicted iFR value, which affected the prognostic capacity. The iFR-guided strategy may be superior in patients with mild to intermediate stenosis.

No abstract