Introduction: Patients often suffer from symptoms during dialysis. Haemodiafiltration (HDF) therapy has been suggested to be superior to standard haemodialysis (HD). To understand patients' experiences, we quantified the burden and duration of dialysis-associated symptoms to determine whether there was any difference between the modalities. Methods: Symptom questionnaires (83.3%) were returned by 623 dialysis outpatients. Symptom scores were analysed using a visual analogue score. We compared symptom burdens during HD and HDF treatments and also whether the scores changed following a modality change to HDF. Results: Among the patients, 55.7% were men, the median age was 65 years, 39.7% were diabetic, 26.4% were treated by HDF and the median unadjusted Charlson co-morbidity score was 6 (IQR 4-8). Fatigue (77.3%), intra-dialytic hypotension (76.4%), cramps (74.3%) and dizziness (63%) were the commonest symptoms reported, followed by headache (53.6%) and pruritus (52.2%). Although most symptoms were reported less frequently with HDF [median headache frequency score: HD: 1 (IQR 1-4) vs. HDF: 0 (IQR 0-2), p < 0.005]. There was no evidence of a reduction in symptom scores in patients switching from HD to HDF compared to those remaining on HD. Conclusion: Patient self-reporting shows that most patients frequently suffer symptoms. There was no evidence that switching to HDF improved symptoms in patients established on HD.
We report an association between ALM index measured by segmental bioimpedance and increased self-reported depression, anxiety and decreased general health. Whether treatment programs designed to improve muscle mass, can lead to reduced levels of depression, and anxiety and improved perceived general health, remains to be determined.
-Conservative care is one of the fastest-changing areas of renal medicine. Non-dialytic therapy is now established as a treatment option in most renal units in the UK. This conference reviewed the history of conservative management and examined the state of current practice. The challenges now faced include expanding the evidence base in this area, improving the information given to patients and their families to help them make a decision about treatment, and responding to changes in NHS funding to ensure continued provision of high-quality care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.