Background and Objectives: Respimat^® Soft Mist™ Inhaler (SMI) is an innovative device that offers improved lung deposition and is an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional, chlorofluorocarbon-containing metered-dose inhalers (CFC-MDIs). The aqueous formulations of bronchodilator drugs administered from Respimat SMI contain low concentrations of ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), a stabilising agent, and benzalkonium chloride (BAC), an antibacterial agent, both of which have been associated with bronchoconstriction when administered via nebulisers. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the incidence of paradoxical bronchoconstriction with bronchodilator drugs administered via Respimat SMI or a CFC-MDI in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Nine randomised, active- and/or placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover studies, in which asthmatic and COPD patients (n = 444 and n = 216, respectively) received a β₂-agonist and/or anticholinergic or placebo via Respimat SMI or CFC-MDI, were included in the analysis. The incidence of conditions indicative of paradoxical bronchoconstriction were collated and divided into four categories: (1) ‘bronchospasm’; (2) two or more of the following events: ‘other respiratory adverse events’, ‘rescue medication use’ or ‘asymptomatic drop in forced expiratory volume in one second’ (FEV₁); (3) either ‘rescue medication use’ or ‘other respiratory adverse event’; (4) ‘asymptomatic drop in FEV₁’. Results: The incidence of adverse events indicative of paradoxical bronchoconstriction was low in those patients using the Respimat SMI device, and similar to that seen in the CFC-MDI group. In addition, the incidence of adverse events indicative of paradoxical bronchoconstriction observed in the Respimat SMI group was similar for BAC + EDTA and BAC-only drug formulations. Conclusions: These studies demonstrate that, due to the extremely low absolute amounts of BAC and EDTA delivered to the lungs by the device, Respimat SMI is safe with regard to paradoxical bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma or COPD.

Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) is a new-generation inhaler that offers improved lung deposition compared with chlorofluorocarbon metered dose inhalers (CFC-MDIs). Bronchodilators administered via Respimat SMI are preserved and stabilised with low concentrations of benzalkonium chloride and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid, both of which have been reported to cause dose-related paradoxical bronchoconstriction. The aim of this analysis was to compare the incidence of paradoxical bronchoconstriction after chronic use of bronchodilators via Respimat SMI and CFC-MDI. Data from three clinical trials, in which patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) received ipratropium bromide alone or in combination with fenoterol hydrobromide, or placebo via Respimat SMI or CFC-MDI for 12 weeks, were included in the analysis. In order to evaluate the risk of paradoxical bronchoconstriction, we identified four respiratory events that might have occurred within 30 min of inhalation on four test days; these were: 'bronchospasm', 'other respiratory adverse events', 'rescue medication use' and 'asymptomatic drop in FEV(1) 15% from baseline'. In total, 631 asthma and 1538 COPD patients participated in the three studies. No occurrences of bronchospasm were reported with Respimat SMI on any test day. Overall, the incidence of respiratory events possibly indicative of paradoxical bronchoconstriction was low and similar for both devices. There was no increase in the incidence of events during 12 weeks' treatment. Delivery of bronchodilators by Respimat SMI is safe with regard to paradoxical bronchoconstriction during chronic use in patients with asthma or COPD.

Background: The phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) for metered dose inhalers (MDIs) has prompted the development of alternative propellants and the design of propellant-free devices for inhalation therapy. Objective: This study was carried out to determine the dose of fenoterol inhaled from Respimat^® (RMT), a new propellant-free soft mist inhaler, which is equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety to 1 puff of either 100 or 200 µg fenoterol inhaled from a conventional CFC-MDI (Berotec^®). Methods: Sixty-two asthmatic patients (35 male, 27 female) with a mean baseline FEV₁ of 1.7 liters, corresponding to 55% of the predicted normal value, were randomized at two study centers to 4 of a total of 8 possible treatments: placebo; 12.5, 25, 50, 100, or 200 µg fenoterol via RMT, and 100 or 200 µg fenoterol delivered via the MDI. Results: Fifty-nine patients completed the study as planned. Results of the therapeutic equivalence test for the primary endpoint, average FEV₁ (AUC_0–6)/6 and for the secondary endpoint, peak FEV₁, showed that the 12.5- and 25-µg fenoterol doses administered via RMT were equivalent to the 100 µg fenoterol dose from the MDI. The 50-, 100- and 200-µg fenoterol doses delivered by RMT did not meet the criterion for therapeutic equivalence with the 100-µg dose from the MDI, and if tested for a difference would have been significantly different in favor of RMT. All 5 RMT fenoterol doses were therapeutically equivalent to the MDI 200-µg fenoterol dose. Headache, reported by 4 patients on test days and 2 patients between test days in those randomized to RMT, was the most common adverse event, but the active treatments were generally well tolerated with no dose-dependent increases in incidence or severity of adverse events observed. Conclusions: The results from the study suggest that safe and efficacious bronchodilation can be obtained from single-dose fenoterol administered via RMT. Use of lower absolute doses to obtain a clinically significant improvement in pulmonary function may be possible because of the increased lung deposition achievable with the novel soft mist inhaler.

No abstract

The bronchodilator response (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) was considered therapeutically equivalent (i.e., noninferior) if the 95% confidence intervals for the difference in their mean changes from baseline were within limits of +/- 0.15L. Systemic exposure was evaluated from plasma fenoterol levels. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RMT50 and RMT100 produced noninferior bronchodilatation to MDI100 from 30minutes after the first dose. RMT50 showed equivalent safety and tolerability to MDI100, whereas RMT100 produced a higher incidence of AEs, a significantly greater plasma potassium reduction and a significant increase in pulse rate. Fenoterol plasma levels were twice as high with RMT100 as with RMT50 or MDI100. CONCLUSIONS; The nominal dose of fenoterol administered via RMT SMI can be at least halved to achieve equivalent efficacy, safety, and tolerability to a MDI.