Our experience and the present analysis support the use of oral cobalamin therapy in clinical practice.

BackgroundBioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) has the potential to be used widely as a method of assessing body fatness and composition, both in clinical and community settings. BIA provides bioelectrical properties, such as whole-body impedance which ideally needs to be calibrated against a gold-standard method in order to provide accurate estimates of fat-free mass. UK studies in older children and adolescents have shown that, when used in multi-ethnic populations, calibration equations need to include ethnic-specific terms, but whether this holds true for younger children remains to be elucidated. The aims of this study were to examine ethnic differences in body size, proportions and composition in children aged 5 to 11 years, and to establish the extent to which such differences could influence BIA calibration.MethodsIn a multi-ethnic population of 2171 London primary school-children (47% boys; 34% White, 29% Black African/Caribbean, 25% South Asian, 12% Other) detailed anthropometric measurements were performed and ethnic differences in body size and proportion were assessed. Ethnic differences in fat-free mass, derived by deuterium dilution, were further evaluated in a subsample of the population (n = 698). Multiple linear regression models were used to calibrate BIA against deuterium dilution.ResultsIn children <11 years of age, Black African/Caribbean children were significantly taller, heavier and had larger body size than children of other ethnicities. They also had larger waist and limb girths and relatively longer legs. Despite these differences, ethnic-specific terms did not contribute significantly to the BIA calibration equation (Fat-free mass = 1.12+0.71*(height2/impedance)+0.18*weight).ConclusionAlthough clear ethnic differences in body size, proportions and composition were evident in this population of young children aged 5 to 11 years, an ethnic-specific BIA calibration equation was not required.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) combines both hemofiltration (HF) and hemodialysis in the same procedure. It was initially performed in adults in 1977, and later used in children in the early 1980s. The use of HDF allows a determined convective dialysis dose to be combined with the conventional urea dialysis dose. The dialysis session is better tolerated as a result of the effects of hemofiltration. On-line HDF, i.e., substitution fluid prepared from ultrafiltration of the ultrapure dialysate, can be performed safely due to recent advances in modern technology. However, despite interest and feasibility in children, the majority of pediatric dialysis units across the world still perform hemodialysis using highly permeable membranes, allowing back filtration in the filter and therefore a degree of convective flow, i.e., internal hemodiafiltration. In some countries, government restrictions prohibit the use of on-line hemodiafiltration, (such as the FDA recommendations in North America), and therefore it should not be used in these circumstances.

No abstract