OBJECTIVE -Our goals were to determine if continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), compared with those continuing multiple daily injections (MDIs), can be safely used in young children, if those on CSII will have superior glycemic control, if subjects using CSII will have less hypoglycemia for their level of control, and if families using CSII will report an improved quality of life.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We conducted a randomized 1-year feasibility trial comparing CSII with continuing MDIs in preschool children with a history of type 1 diabetes for at least 6 months' duration. Prospective outcomes included measures of overall glycemic control (HbA 1c and continuous glucose monitoring system), the incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis, the percent of glucose values below 3.9 mmol/l, and the parents' report of quality of life.RESULTS -The 19 subjects' ages ranged from 1.7 to 6.1 (mean 3.6) years, duration of diabetes ranged from 0.6 to 2.6 (mean 1.4) years, and baseline HbA 1c ranged from 6.7 to 9.6% (mean 7.9%). Seven subjects were male. Nine subjects were randomized to start CSII and 10 to continue on MDI. All baseline characteristics were well balanced. Overall metabolic control, diabetes quality of life, and the incidence of hypoglycemia were similar in the two groups. No subject had diabetic ketoacidosis, while one subject in each group had an episode of severe hypoglycemia. No CSII subject discontinued using the pump during or after the study.CONCLUSIONS -CSII can be a safe and effective method to deliver insulin in young children. Diabetes Care 28:15-19, 2005S ince its introduction in the late 1970s, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), or insulin pump therapy, has become an increasingly popular option for type 1 diabetes management (1,2), particularly following the push for improved metabolic control in the post-Diabetes Control and Complications Trial era (3). The potential advantages of such therapy over multiple daily injections (MDIs) include ease of insulin administration, improved metabolic control with reduced swings in glucose and decreased risk of hypoglycemia, better matching of insulin to carbohydrate intake, improved coverage of the dawn phenomenon and adjustment of basal insulin delivery at other times of the day, increased flexibility in daily living, and improved coping with diabetes (4,5). Potential disadvantages of CSII relative to MDI include increased cost, inconvenience of wearing a device, risk for subcutaneous infection at the pump infusion site, and diabetic ketoacidosis.CSII has traditionally been reserved for savvy adolescents and adults, but it is gaining more widespread acceptance in children as well (6 -12). One age-group in which the technology has been used sparingly but who may benefit from CSII is infants and toddlers. Although parents or other adult supervisors are available to oversee frequent glucose monitoring and multiple insulin injections, it is usually difficult to achieve near-normal metabolic control in this populatio...

Half of the biographer low-glucose alarms that had corresponding blood meter values were true-positive alarms, and the remaining were false-positive alarms. There was close correlation between the biographer and meter glucose values. The majority of campers found the biographer helpful and would use it at home.

Background ADG20 is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered to have high potency and broad neutralization against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other SARS-like CoVs with pandemic potential by binding to a highly conserved epitope in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. The Fc region of ADG20 has been modified to provide an extended half-life. ADG20 is in clinical development for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Methods This is an ongoing Phase 1, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, single ascending-dose study of ADG20 administered intramuscularly (IM) or intravenously (IV) to healthy adults aged 18–50 years with no evidence of prior or current SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomized 8:2 in 3 cohorts (N=10/cohort: n=8 ADG20, n=2 PBO): ADG20 300 mg IM, 500 mg IV, and 600 mg IM. Safety, tolerability, PK, and sVNA titers were assessed up to 3 months post dose. Serum ADG20 concentrations were measured with a validated hybrid ligand binding liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (MS)/MS assay. sVNA titers against authentic SARS-CoV-2 were determined by a plaque reduction neutralization assay. Results Overall, 30 participants received ADG20 (n=24) or PBO (n=6). Blinded safety data for all cohorts and PK/sVNA titer data for the 300 mg IM cohort are reported. Through a minimum of 10 weeks post dose, no study drug-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, injection site reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions were reported. The observed preliminary PK profile was dose proportional, consistent with an extended half-life monoclonal antibody, and well predicted by translational physiologically-based PK modeling. The measured 50% sVNA titer (MN50; geometric mean [coefficient of variation, %]) was 1382 (32.7%) 13 days after a single 300 mg IM dose. These values are within the range of peak serum neutralizing antibody titers reported for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Conclusion A single dose of ADG20, up to 600 mg IM, was well tolerated. Preliminary PK and sVNA titer profiles support the ongoing Phase 2/3 trials of ADG20 at a 300 mg IM dose for the prevention of COVID-19 (EVADE: NCT04859517) and treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 (STAMP: NCT04805671). Disclosures Helen Paguntalan, MD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Zoltán Magyarics, MD, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Lynn E. Connolly, MD, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Ellie Hershberger, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Kristin Narayan, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Deepali Gupta, BS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Paul G. Ambrose, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Frank Engler, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Ed Campanaro, BSN, MSHS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Anita F. Das, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Pete Schmidt, MD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee)