A number of novel urinary biomarkers have been identified and partially qualified for use as markers for renal injury in rats. We used two multiplex assays for these novel biomarkers to quantify biomarker concentration in serial urine collections from rats of both sexes administered varying concentrations of cisplatin. From these data, we calculate inter-individual variation and reference ranges from predose animals and intra-individual variation and reference change values from undosed control animals. The biomarkers evaluated are albumin, α glutathione s-transferase, glutathione S-transferase-yb1, lipocalin-2, kidney injury molecule-1, osteopontin, and renal papillary antigen 1. For any creatinine-corrected novel biomarkers, we found intra-individual variation to be no greater than 44% and inter-individual variation to be no greater than 46%. Reference change values for most corrected analytes (except osteopontin) were 50-100%, indicating that a >100% increase in analyte concentration between serial samples would be unlikely to be associated with inherent analytical or biological variation.
A number of novel urinary biomarkers have been identified and partially qualified for use as markers for renal injury in rats. We use two novel multiplex assays to quantify biomarker concentration in multiple urine collections made prior to and following administration of cisplatin, a common nephrotoxicant, to rats. We investigate the correlation of the magnitude of biomarker changes with the severity of histopathological observations and explore the relationship of these to both dose and sex. The novel biomarkers evaluated are urinary albumin, alpha glutathione s-transferase (α-GST), glutathione S-transferase-yb1 (GSTYb1), lipocalin-2, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), osteopontin, and renal papillary antigen 1 (RPA-1) and plasma cystatin C, alongside the traditional biomarkers of plasma urea, creatinine, and urinary n-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), total protein, and glucose. We show for all time points, and for almost all doses, that male rats consistently had either more severely graded or a higher incidence of histologically observed lesions than females; that changes in urinary glucose, total urinary protein, NAG, and the novel urinary biomarkers albumin, osteopontin, and KIM-1 are clearly temporally associated; and that changes are related to the severity of injury. We also found that receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve are significantly higher than urea or creatinine for all new biomarkers except aGST, GSTYb1, cystatin c, and total protein in both sexes.
A number of novel urinary biomarkers have been identified and partially qualified for use as markers for renal injury in rats. To date, all evaluation studies have been made using 18 to 24 hour collection periods. However, shorter, more welfare friendly, urine collection periods are also used in industry. In this article, we quantify urinary biomarker concentration in serial paired sequential short and long urine collections from male rats administered varying concentrations of cisplatin. We calculate the rate of biomarker excretion in normal animals for both collection periods and the bias and correlation in urinary biomarker concentration between collection periods in dosed and control animals, and we estimate the level of agreement in biomarker concentration between both collection periods. We conclude that although there are minor differences in the concentration of some urinary biomarkers that are dependent upon the time and duration of collection, shorter collection protocols do not influence subsequent interpretation of normalized urinary biomarker data for most biomarkers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.