Turnbull and Cutait described abdominoperineal pull-through followed by delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCA) in 1961. DCA could reduce anastomotic leaks, pelvic morbidity and use of stomas. Strong evidence about its clinical benefits is still lacking. This systematic review examined the clinical outcomes of DCA for the treatment of malignant or benign colorectal conditions. A systematic search of electronic medical databases was conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome was pelvic morbidity (anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess or sepsis, use of stoma). Fecal continence and survival data were also analyzed. From 1,251 citations, we included seven observational studies including 1,124 patients. All included studies were considered at high risk of bias. Two studies comparing DCA with immediate anastomosis reported a significant decrease in anastomotic leak, and pelvic abscess or sepsis. Low rates of pelvic morbidity were reported in the other five studies: anastomotic leak 0-7 %, pelvic abscess 0-11.8 % and pelvic sepsis 6.8-10 %. Rates of permanent stoma after DCA were low in six studies (1-6 %), with one study reporting an incidence of 25 %. Fecal continence was reported as satisfying in all studies. No differences were observed in a comparative setting. Survival data were reported in four studies. Clinical heterogeneity and methodological issues precluded meta-analysis. Based on retrospective evidence, DCA offers a low rate of anastomotic leak, pelvic morbidity and use of stoma, with reasonable fecal continence. Results are encouraging, but prospective studies are needed for comparison with standard of care.

Background: Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through followed by delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCA) was first described in 1961. Studies have described its use for challenging colorectal conditions. We reviewed our experience with Turnbull-Cutait DCA as a salvage procedure for complex failure of colorectal anastomosis. Methods:We performed a retrospective cohort study from October 2010 to September 2011, with analysis of postoperative morbidity and mortality.Results: Seven DCAs were performed for anastomotic complications (3 chronic leaks, 2 rectovaginal fistulas, 1 colovesical fistula, 1 colonic ischemia) following surgery for rectal cancer. Six patients had a diverting ileostomy constructed as part of previous treatment for anastomotic complications before the salvage procedure. No anastomotic leaks were observed. All procedures but 1 were completed successfully. One patient who underwent DCA subsequently required an abdominoperineal resection and a permanent colostomy for postoperative extensive colonic ischemia. No 30-day mortality occurred. Conclusion:Salvage Turnbull-Cutait DCA appears to be a safe procedure and could be offered to patients with complex anastomotic complications. This procedure could be added to the surgeon's armamentarium as an alternative to the creation of a permanent stoma. Résultats : Sept CAD ont été réalisées en raison de complications anastomotiques (3 fuites anastomotiques chroniques, 2 fistules rectovaginales, 1 fistule colovésicale, 1 ischémie colique) résultant du traitement chirurgical d'un cancer rectal. Six patients avaient subi une iléostomie de dérivation pour fuite anastomotique, dans la période précédant la CAD de sauvetage. À l'exception d'un patient, toutes les procédures se sont soldées en succès. Aucune fuite anastomotique n'a été observée après CAD. Un patient a dû subir une résection abdominopérinéale avec colostomie terminale permanente en raison d'ischémie colique aigue du colon distal après CAD. Aucun décès n'est survenu dans les 30 jours suivant la CAD.Conclusion : La CAD de sauvetage apparait comme une intervention sécuritaire qui représente une option thérapeutique valable pour les patients souffrant de complications complexes de fuites anastomotiques colorectales. Cette intervention pourrait s'ajouter à l'arsenal du chirurgien comme alternative à la création d'une stomie permanente.

Bariatric patients are difficult to assess clinically for signs of postoperative complication. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is used to investigate patients suspicious for complications such as anastomotic leak (AL) and intra-abdominal hemorrhage (IH). Most bariatric surgeons use DL in the presence of sustained tachycardia; however, the rate of this procedure and its clinical value have not been sufficiently investigated.A retrospective review of patients undergoing bariatric surgery from January 2010 to December 2011 was performed. Data from 4 collaborative bariatric centres of excellence were included in this analysis. From among all elective bariatric procedures, cases that required early reoperation were selected for further evaluation.A total of 1001 elective bariatric procedures were identified. Of these, 952 (95%) were primary bariatric procedures, including 866 (91%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses and 86 (9%) sleeve gastrectomies. The remaining 48 cases represented revisional proced ures. Of these, 11 patients (1.1%) returned to the operating room within 72 hours for DL: 64% were primary cases (n = 7) and 36% revisional cases (n = 4). Intraoperative findings included AL (45%, n = 5), IH (27%, n = 3), no pathology identified (18%, n = 2) and small bowel obstruction (9%, n = 1). Of the 9 patients with complications, all were tachycardic (heart rate > 100 beats/min), and 4 of the 5 patients with AL were febrile (t > 37.5). There were no reported adverse events directly related to the use of DL.Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful and safe option for both the diagnosis and treatment of suspected complications after bariatric surgery. The majority of patients returning to operating room had significant findings, and all were treated laparoscopically. Persistent postoperative tachycardia or fever were highly predictive of positive findings during DL. An emphasis on early decisionmaking and expeditious return to the operating room for laparoscopy should be the standard for bariatric patients on clinical suspicion of a postoperative complication. 4Changes of active and total ghrelin, GLP-1 and PYY following restrictive bariatric surgery and their impact on satiety: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. A