No abstract

Summary. In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) different prognostic risk analysis systems based on clinical and morphological data are used for predicting survival. Data on diagnostic and prognostic relevance of karyotype aberrations have prompted the development of scores including cytogenetics. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the explanatory power of different scoring systems and to assess the additional explanatory power of cytogenetics by evaluating the clinical and laboratory data of MDS patients from a single institution. Data of 386 MDS patients was available, with cytogenetic analysis at time of diagnosis in 256. Clinical/morphological scores: Bournemouth, modi®ed Bournemouth and Du È sseldorf; and scores including cytogenetics: Lausanne±Bournemouth, Lille and the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), were calculated and their predictive power was compared for both overall survival and preleukaemic duration. Each of the scores had signi®cant correlation on both endpoints. Calculating the prognostic value of different cytogenetic aberrations we found that differentiating between evidence for no aberration, single aberrations excluding chromosomes 7 and 8, aberrations on chromosomes 5, 7 or 8 and complex aberrations was important. These data were incorporated in a`prognostic index cytogenetics' (pi score). Cytogenetic scores signi®cantly improved the prognostic value of the best clinical/morphological score in regard to both overall survival and preleukaemic duration. In conclusion, our data further stress the importance of cytogenetics for predicting prognosis in MDS.

No abstract

Chromosome aberrations affecting band 3q21 are associated with a particularly poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. To facilitate the molecular characterization of such rearrangements, we established a PAC contig covering the relevant genomic region. Using these PACs as probes in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments, we showed that a number of 3q21 breakpoints in patient samples map to a previously defined 'breakpoint cluster region'. Others, however, are located at varying distances centromeric of it. These results have important implications in the search for genes affected by 3q21 rearrangements.

Cytogenetics have proved to be a valuable tool for classifying systemic lymphatic neoplasms, as this technique allows different stem line aberrations and clonal developments to be distinguished. This study was designed to analyze how far groups defined according to common cytogenetic features correlated with their position in either the Kiel (KC) or the REAL classification. Cytogenetic analyses were performed on material from 175 patients with lymphoid neoplasms (LN). Samples were prepared from peripheral blood and bone marrow in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), from bone marrow in multiple myeloma (MM), and from lymph node biopsies in lymphomas. The results of this study support the inclusion of ALL, MM, and extranodal lymphomas into a comprehensive classification, because their chromosomal aberrations were always characteristic for LN. From the cytogenetic point of view, a subgroup of ALL appears as a leukemic manifestation of lymphoblastic lymphoma. MM have structural aberrations of chromosomes 1, 11, and 14 and secondary aberrations of chromosomes 3, 6, 7, 12, 13, and 18, all of which are characteristic for lymphatic disease. The groups with follicle center cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma correlate well with our results both in the low-grade subtype and in the blastic variant type, the majority of cases demonstrating t(14; 18) and its variants and t(11; 14), respectively. In contrast, the group of diffuse large B-cell (DLB) lymphomas proved to be heterogeneous on the basis of our cytogenetic results. Accordingly, we would suggest keeping the immunoblastic lymphoma (IB) subtype defined by the KC. IB demonstrates no stem line aberration in common with any other group and seems to be characterized by stem line aberrations involving chromosomes 3 and 6. As some DLB lymphomas have a t(14;18) or variant translocations involving chromosome 18, they should either be separated as a subgroup or included into the group of follicle center lymphomas.