The effect of a mixture of 10 compounds, which have previously been identified in an effect-directed analysis as potentially relevant for a specific contaminated riverine sediment (Brack et al. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1999, 37, 164), were investigated for the underlying joint effect. Components identified in an organic sediment extract included several PAHs (benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, benz[a]anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, 2-phenylnaphthalene, anthracene, and phenanthrene) plus prometryn, N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine, and parathion-methyl. Experiments were performed using a one-generation algal bioassay with the unicellular green algae Scenedesmus vacuolatus as well as chlorophyll fluorescence quenching analysis to describe the effects of the components and mixtures thereof. Analysis of the mixture effects based on concentration-response modeling of the effect data reveals that indeed effect contributions of several components can be expected although the mixture ratio is not equitoxic and the individual components vary greatly with respect to biological effect. Comparing predicted and observed mixture effects, the combined effect may not be attributed to a joint narcotic effect of the mixture components. Evidently, some of the components act specifically and dissimilar and may therefore be best described in their combined effect by response addition while for others a similar mode of action seems plausible. Chlorophyll fluorescence quenching analysis supports to discriminate between prometryn, N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine, and PAHs. A joint model for calculating the combined effect using concentration addition for the suspected unspecifically acting components in algae (PAHs and parathion-methyl) and subsequently response addition for this group and the other components clearly improves the description of the observed combined effect. Allocation of effect contributions to specific components using toxic units or effect contributions lead to different judgments. The observed combined effect of a 3-compound mixture of prometryn, N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine, and benzo[ghi]fluoranthene is indistinguishable from the effects of the original 10-compound mixture, demonstrating the need in site-specific assessment of complex contamination to account for the mode of action of contaminants. Implications forthe confirmation step in effect-directed analysis of substances causing effects in complex contaminated samples are discussed.

No abstract

No abstract

Environmental exposure situations are often characterised by a multitude of heterogeneous chemicals with ambiguous or unknown modes of action present at low concentrations. While multiple exposure is widely acknowledged, arguments are raised that adverse combined effects might not be evoked by mixtures of substances with dissimilar modes of action and being present at only low concentrations. In this study the combined effect of a multiple mixture composed of structurally dissimilar priority pollutants with mostly unknown modes of action has been investigated using an algal biotest. The concentrations of the components in the mixture equalled statistically estimated, individual no observed effect concentrations (NOECs). The observed mixture toxicity was not only clearly higher than expected for any single substance alone, but also well predictable using the concept of independent action.

During the river Elbe flood in August 2002, large amounts of suspended organic matter were transported and settled in the course of the river. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of river Elbe sediments using chemical and biological methods. For this purpose 11 samples from river Elbe and 2 from tributaries were investigated. Two contact biotest systems, used to identify the ecotoxic potential of sediments, showed toxic effects in all sediments. Exposure was assessed by quantification of priority pollutants; however, no causal link to biological effects could be established. Effect qualities were characterised by testing organic sediment extracts in a biotest battery consisting of 8 test systems. Test systems varied in sensitivity to detect effects in the samples. Furthermore, samples differed in their ecotoxic potential. An effect‐directed analysis was conducted in order to identify compounds responsible for the biological effects. Cause‐effect relationships were established for mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons being partially responsible for toxic effects on algal reproduction; however the majority of the cause for toxicity remained unclear. Overall, it has to be concluded that Elbe sediments are not in accord with current quality goals. The chemical and the biological transect profile of the sediments indicate toxicant inputs from Czech Republic, river Mulde and diverse source.