Background and Purpose:h-index has been always reviewed as one of the most useful criteria for evaluating the scientific outputs of researchers by the sciencometric experts. In this study, the h-index of 40 Iranian researchers accompanied with its relationship to assessment criteria of scientific outputs such as the number of articles, scientific age, number of citations and self-citation were reviewed.Materials and Methods:The first part of this study was related to the literature review. But the information of 40 Iranian researchers’ Citation Reports was observational extracted from WOS database and the Pearson correlation coefficient test was used to answer the research hypothesesResults:Citation analysis showed that 40 selected researchers published 877 articles in web of science up to 9 January 2013. These articles have been cited 3858 time. The average of their h-index was estimated 38.5 ±12.12 Correlation coefficient test showed that there was a significant and direct relationship between the h-index and the number of papers, the number of citations and self-citation (Sig>0.05) but there was no significant relationship between scientific age and h-index (Sig> 0.05).Conclusions:Analysis of the data showed that the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the researchers with the same h-index had considerable differences. Therefore, only the h-index should not be a criterion for scientific ranking of the researchers and other complementary indexes such as M parameter and G index along with h-index must be used to be able to more accurately determine the degree of scientific influence of the researchers with the same h.
Background Nowadays, it is generally assumed that non-pharmacologic pain relief in preterm infants is an important measure to consider. Research findings suggest that familiar odors have soothing effects for neonates. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of maternal breast milk odor (MBMO) with that of another mother’s breast milk odor (BMO) on the behavioral responses to pain caused by hepatitis B (HB) vaccine injection in preterm infants. Methods This single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed over the period between February 2019 and March 2020 in the neonatal intensive care unit of Babol Rouhani Hospital, Iran. Ninety preterm infants, who were supposed to receive their HB vaccine, were randomly assigned into three groups: MBMO (A), another mother’s BMO (B), and control with distilled water(C). Oxygen saturation (SaO2), blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded for all participants through electronic monitoring. In addition, premature infant pain profiles (PIPP) were determined through video recording for all three groups during intervention. The chi-square, ANOVA and ANCOVA were used for analyzing the data, and P < 0.05 was considered significant in this study. Results No significant differences were found between the three groups in mean ± SD of HR, BP, and Sao2 before the intervention (P > 0.05). After the intervention, however, the means for heart rate in groups A, B, and C were 146 ± 14.3, 153 ± 17.5 and 155 ± 17.7, respectively (P = 0.012). Moreover, the means for PIPP scores in groups A, B and C were 6.6 ± 1.3, 10 ± 2, and 11.4 ± 1.9, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference found between groups in their means of SaO2, systolic and diastolic blood pressure after the intervention (P > 0.05). Conclusions The results indicate that stimulation with MBMO is effective in reducing pain in preterm infants; therefore, it can be postulated that this technique can be considered in less invasive procedures such as needling. Trial registration IRCT, IRCT20190220042771N1. Registered 18 May 2019- Retrospectively registered,
Background: Improvement in adenoma detection rate (ADR) reduces colorectal cancer incidence by increasing the colonoscopy quality. Using dynamic patient position changes during the withdrawal phase has shown promise in increasing ADR. We conducted this study to assess the effectiveness of the supine position on the improvement of ADR to improve its feasibility and avoid frequent patient position changes, particularly in sedated patients.Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, single-center study implemented in the Mehregan private in Babol. Inclusion criteria were 40 to 85 years old, 4 L application of polyethylene glycol from the day before the procedure, no history of inflammatory bowel disease, bowel surgery, musculoskeletal problems, and negative familial history of colorectal cancer. Patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the supine or left lateral positions during the withdrawal phase. All colonoscopies were performed by a single physician using a Fujifilm colonoscope. A P-value of <0.005 was considered statistically significant.Results: A total of 880 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 472 patients were included in the final analysis; 53.4% were female, the mean age of participants was 55.86±10.30 years old, 95.1% of patients had adequate bowel preparation, and adenomatous polyps were the most common histopathologic type (63.7%). Despite the intervention group’s higher rate of ADR and PDR (19.5% vs. 17.7% for ADR and 27.2% vs. 26.5% for PDR), no statistically significant difference in ADR or PDR was detected (P=0.613 and 0.866). Conclusion: No statistical significance was observed despite the increase in ADR when the supine position was used exclusively during the withdrawal phase. As a result, we recommend that the dynamic position change method be used if a position change is required. Nonetheless, additional research is required to determine a more effective alternative to dynamic position change in obese or heavily sedated patients.Trial registration: IRCTID: IRCT20110721007080N5, registration date: 04/05/2020
Background: Pain control in preterm infants is especially important if the necessary measures are not taken in this regard, the evolutionary process of the brain will be disrupted, and the unrelieved pain can have lifelong consequences. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of maternal breast milk odor (MBMO) with that of another mother’s breast milk odor (BMO) on the behavioral responses to pain caused by hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) injection in preterm infants.Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was performed in the neonatal intensive care unit of Babol Rouhani Hospital, Iran from February 2019 to March 2020. Totally, 90 preterm infants who were to receive the HBV for the first time were randomly selected by random sampling. The neonates were randomly assigned into three groups of (A) MBMO (B) another mother’s BMO and (C) control (distilled water).The data were collected using a questionnaire of demographic characteristics and premature infant pain profile (PIPP). Physiological data were recorded by the pulse oximeter immediately before and after the intervention. The data were analyzed using SPSS18 through chi-square, ANOVA and ANCOVA, and P<0.05 was considered as significant level.Results: Before intervention, there was no significant difference between groups in the mean of heart rate, blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) percentage (P>0.05). After intervention, there was no significant difference between these A, B and C groups in the mean of systolic blood pressure (70.90±8.29, 70.27±6.70 and 71.77±9.07), diastolic blood pressure (43.63±9.59, 41.77±7.10 and 44.03±10.76) and SaO2 percentage (95.20±5.20, 94.00±6.23 and 91.13±11.78), respectively (P>0.05). However, after intervention, there was a significant difference between groups of A, B and C in the mean of heart rate (146. 6±14.3, 153.70±17.5 and 155.70±17.7), respectively (P=0.01). Moreover, the mean PIPP score was 6.6±1.3, 10 ±2 and 11.4±1.9 in groups A, B and C respectively, so that a significant statistical difference was found between groups (P<0.001). Conclusions: Stimulation with MBMO is effective in reducing the pain of preterm infants, so it can be used in less invasive procedures such as vaccination.Trial registration: IRCT, IRCT20190220042771N1. Registered 18 May 2019- Retrospectively registered, https://en.irct.ir/trial/37646
Background and Objectives:The emerging coronavirus, which there was no information on the way of its diseasecausing at the beginning of the outbreak, caused anxiety among health care workers who were at the forefront of the fight against coronavirus. This study aimed to evaluate anxiety during coronavirus pandemic among healthcare workers in Babol. Materials and Methods:The present descriptive study was conducted in 2020 among 260 healthcare workers of Babol health centers selected by stratified random method. Data were collected using a questionnaire to measure individual and occupational characteristics and to determine the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were used to analyze the data. Results:The mean and standard deviation scores of the total anxiety scale, psychological symptoms of anxiety, and physical symptoms of anxiety among healthcare workers in Babol were 12.13±8.02, 9.86±5.35, and 3.69±2.27, respectively. No or mild anxiety was observed among 195 people (75%) of healthcare workers, and 65 people (25%) had moderate to high anxiety. A chi-square test showed that there was a statistically significant relationship between sex and psychological symptoms of anxiety (p=0.016), sex and total anxiety (p=0.010) and the rate of anxiety was higher in women. Conclusion:The results showed that the level of anxiety in the healthcare workers of Babol who were at risk of exposure to coronavirus was low that indicates the optimal mental and physical condition of individuals in the face of critical situations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.