This cocktail study evaluated the interaction potential of the oral lavender oil preparation silexan with major P450 (cytochrome P450) enzymes. Subjects and Methods: Sixteen healthy male or female Caucasians completed this double-blind, randomized, 2-fold crossover study. Silexan (160 mg) or placebo were administered once daily for 11 days. Additionally, on day 11 of both study periods, 150 mg caffeine (CYP1A2), 125 mg tolbutamide (CYP2C9), 20 mg omeprazole (CYP2C19), 30 mg dextromethorphan-HBr (CYP2D6), and 2 mg midazolam (CYP3A4) were administered orally. Formal interaction was excluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the silexan over placebo ratios for phenotyping metrics (primary: AUC 0-t ) was within a 0.70-1.43 range. Results: According to the AUC 0-t comparisons, silexan had no relevant effect on CYP1A2, 2C9, 2D6, and 3A4 activity. Secondary phenotyping metrics confirmed this result. Mean ratios for all omeprazole-derived metrics were close to unity. The 90% CI for the AUC 0-t ratio of omeprazole but not for omeprazole/5-OH-omeprazole plasma ratio 3 hours post-dose or omeprazole/5-OH-omeprazole AUC 0-t ratio (secondary CYP2C19 metrics) was above the predefined threshold of 1.43, probably caused by the inherent high variability of omeprazole pharmacokinetics. Silexan and the phenotyping drugs were well tolerated. Repeated silexan (160 mg/day) administration has no clinically relevant inhibitory or inducing effects on the CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 enzymes in vivo.

Silibinin, the main component of silymarin (a milk thistle extract used for treatment of liver injury), has been shown to inhibit CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes. The present study was conducted to examine whether inhibition of CYP3A4 by silymarin is also present IN VIVO. Immediate release nifedipine (10 mg) was administered as a CYP3A4 test drug either alone or with co-administration of silymarin (280 mg administered 10 hours and 1.5 hours prior to the administration of nifedipine) to 16 healthy male volunteers (mean age 27 years, mean body weight 77 kg). Nifedipine and silibinin concentrations were quantified by HPLC, heart rate and blood pressure were monitored for safety reasons. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental methods, and the potential interaction by silymarin was handled as an equivalence problem. We found that nifedipine AUC was 1.13-fold higher (90 % CI, 0.97- to 1.32-fold) in the silymarin period, C (max) values were 0.70-fold (90 % CI, 0.39- to 1.27-fold) of those of the reference period, with a trend to delayed absorption in the silymarin period. Intraindividual variability especially for C (max) (intrasubject CV 120 %) was unexpectedly high. There was no meaningful effect on hemodynamic parameters. In conclusion, our data suggest that co-administration of silymarin does not considerably change the extent of absorption or metabolism of nifedipine but may decrease the absorption rate. Silymarin thus is not a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor IN VIVO.

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine undergoes extensive metabolism by N-acetylation. While there is some evidence for an involvement of N-acetyltransferase (NAT) type 1, a potential role of NAT type 2 (NAT2) in vivo has not been tested. METHODS: In two studies in healthy young Caucasians, NAT2 phenotyping was carried out using a caffeine metabolic ratio in urine 4-6 h postdose. In study A, 1,000 mg mesalazine doses were given thrice daily for 5 days, and urine and blood samples were drawn during the last dosing interval. In study B, a 1,000 mg single dose was given, and samples were taken for 48 h postdose. Pharmacokinetics of mesalazine and N-acetylmesalazine (LC-MS/MS) were calculated by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: NAT2 phenotype could be allocated unequivocally in 21 slow and 5 rapid acetylators in study A, and in 9 slow and 8 rapid acetylators in study B. Geometric mean (CV%) values in study A for slow [rapid] acetylators were as follows: mesalazine AUC 11.1 microg/mL.h (51%) [12.0 microg/mL.h (52%)], N-acetylmesalazine AUC 27.7 microg/mL.h (32%) [30.5 microg/mL.h (27%)], mesalazine Ae 8.53% (89%) Statistics provided no evidence for a true difference in mesalazine pharmacokinetics between slow and rapid acetylators, and no significant correlation between NAT2 activity and any mesalazine pharmacokinetic parameter was found. CONCLUSION: NAT2 has no major role in human metabolism of mesalazine in vivo.