This paper presents an overview of the ImageCLEF 2022 lab that was organized as part of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum -CLEF Labs 2022. ImageCLEF is an ongoing evaluation initiative (first run in 2003) that promotes the evaluation of technologies for annotation, indexing and retrieval of visual data with the aim of providing information access to large collections of images in various usage scenarios and domains. In 2022, the 20th edition of ImageCLEF runs four main tasks: (i) a medical task that groups two previous tasks, i.e., caption analysis and tuberculosis prediction, (ii) a social media aware task on estimating potential real-life effects of online image sharing, (iii) a nature coral task about segmenting and labeling collections of coral reef images, and (iv) a new fusion task addressing the design of late fusion schemes for boosting the performance, with two real-world applications: image search diversification (retrieval) and prediction of visual interestingness (regression). The benchmark campaign received the participation of over 25 groups submitting more than 258 runs.

No abstract

Understanding customer feedback is becoming a necessity for companies to identify problems and improve their products and services. Text classification and sentiment analysis can play a major role in analyzing this data by using a variety of machine and deep learning approaches. In this work, different transformer-based models are utilized to explore how efficient these models are when working with a German customer feedback dataset. In addition, these pre-trained models are further analyzed to determine if adapting them to a specific domain using unlabeled data can yield better results than off-the-shelf pre-trained models. To evaluate the models, two downstream tasks from the GermEval 2017 are considered. The experimental results show that transformer-based models can reach significant improvements compared to a fastText baseline and outperform the published scores and previous models. For the subtask Relevance Classification, the best models achieve a micro-averaged F1-Score of 96.1 % on the first test set and 95.9 % on the second one, and a score of 85.1 % and 85.3 % for the subtask Polarity Classification.

No abstract

No abstract