In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

No abstract

In skeletal muscle, protein levels are determined by relative rates of protein synthesis and breakdown. The balance between synthesis and degradation of intracellular components determines the overall muscle fiber size. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a sensor of cellular energy status, was recently shown to increase myofibrillar protein degradation through the expression of MAFbx and MuRF1. In the present study, the effect of AMPK activation by AICAR on autophagy was investigated in muscle cells. Our results show that FoxO3a transcription factor activation by AMPK induces the expression of the autophagy-related proteins LC3B-II, Gabarapl1, and Beclin1 in primary mouse skeletal muscle myotubes and in the Tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. Time course studies reveal that AMPK activation by AICAR leads to a transient nuclear relocalization of FoxO3a followed by an increase of its cytosolic level. Moreover, AMPK activation leads to the inhibition of mTORC1 and its subsequent dissociation of Ulk1, Atg13, and FIP200 complex. Interestingly, we identify Ulk1 as a new interacting partner of AMPK in muscle cells and we show that Ulk1 is associated with AMPK under normal conditions and dissociates from AMPK during autophagy process. Moreover, we find that AMPK phosphorylates FoxO3a and Ulk1. In conclusion, our data show that AMPK activation stimulates autophagy in skeletal muscle cells through its effects on the transcriptional function of FoxO3a and takes part in the initiation of autophagosome formation by interacting with Ulk1. Here, we present new evidences that AMPK plays a crucial role in the fine tuning of protein expression programs that control skeletal muscle mass.

Forkhead box class O family member proteins (FoxOs) are highly conserved transcription factors with important roles in cellular homeostasis. The four FoxO members in humans, FoxO1, FoxO3, FoxO4, and FoxO6, are all expressed in skeletal muscle, but the first three members are the most studied in muscle. In this review, we detail the multiple modes of FoxO regulation and discuss the central role of these proteins in the control of skeletal muscle plasticity. FoxO1 and FoxO3 are key factors of muscle energy homeostasis through the control of glycolytic and lipolytic flux, and mitochondrial metabolism. They are also key regulators of protein breakdown, as they modulate the activity of several actors in the ubiquitin–proteasome and autophagy–lysosomal proteolytic pathways, including mitochondrial autophagy, also called mitophagy. FoxO proteins have also been implicated in the regulation of the cell cycle, apoptosis, and muscle regeneration. Depending of their activation level, FoxO proteins can exhibit ambivalent functions. For example, a basal level of FoxO factors is necessary for cellular homeostasis and these proteins are required for adaptation to exercise. However, exacerbated activation may occur in the course of several diseases, resulting in metabolic disorders and atrophy. A better understanding of the precise functions of these transcriptions factors should thus lead to the development of new therapeutic approaches to prevent or limit the muscle wasting that prevails in numerous pathological states, such as immobilization, denervated conditions, neuromuscular disease, aging, AIDS, cancer, and diabetes.

The distribution of antidiabetic sulfonylurea [( 3H]glibenclamide) binding sites is heterogeneous in rat brain. Pyramidal and extrapyramidal motor system contain the highest densities of sites, particularly in the substantia nigra and in the globus pallidus. Only low levels are present in the hypothalamic nuclei and the main medulla oblongata regions. In hippocampal formation the stratum lucidum and the stratum lacunosum moleculare of CA3 show an important density of glibenclamide binding sites. Electrophysiological studies with hippocampal slices show that glibenclamide blocks hyperpolarization induced by anoxia, suggesting the involvement of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K+ channel in this early hyperpolarization event.