Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is gaining popularity as an alternative to traditional bilateral exploration for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The success of MIP relies on the ability of preoperative and intraoperative localization studies to guide a directed exploration for resection of a diseased gland. We hypothesize that excellent results can be achieved with MIP when only technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) is used for localization. We conducted a prospective analysis of all patients presenting with a biochemical diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism between January 1997 and November 2000. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were given a choice of MIP and directed exploration versus traditional bilateral exploration. Fifty patients chose MIP. Three patients who chose MIP had a negative MIBI, which left 47 patients in the primary study group. The MIBI correctly identified a parathyroid adenoma in 42 patients (89.3%). In two other patients MIBI was inaccurate; however, directed exploration was successfully converted to a bilateral exploration. Overall 44 of 47 (93.6%) patients in the study group were rendered normocalcemic after the initial operation. Three patients experienced persistent hypercalcemia and subsequently underwent successful bilateral exploration. Including those patients choosing a bilateral exploration, a total of 59 positive MIBI scans were evaluated. There were 54 true positives (positive predictive value 91.5%), and if all patients had chosen a MIP 94.9 per cent would have been successfully treated at the initial operation. Mean operative time for MIP was 54.6 minutes, and in 32 patients (68.1%) MIP was performed with local anesthesia and sedation. Twenty-six patients (55.3%) were discharged the same day of the procedure. There were no significant complications in any group analyzed. We conclude that MIP can be successfully performed on the basis of a positive MIBI scan. The present study highlighting many of the advantages of MIP questions the necessity of additional adjuncts such as intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement and γ-probe localization.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) is a sensitive and specific indicator of breast pathology. Commonly the first biopsy core is taken from the center of the lesion in question. Multiple cores are then taken from points peripheral to the central core. The sensitivity and specificity of the central core to diagnose breast disease is unclear. We compared the pathology of the central core biopsy with that of the remaining cores in a prospective study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the central core to diagnose breast disease. All patients undergoing SCNB for breast lesions in a single surgical office during a 7-month period were eligible for inclusion. One hundred thirty-three patients with first cores from 145 biopsy sites were included. The histologic diagnosis from 117 (81%) of the first cores from these 145 biopsy sites were representative of their respective samples as a whole. Seventy-seven (53%) of the first cores were in complete agreement with the final histologic diagnosis whereas 40 (28%) had minor differences with the histologic diagnosis that had little or no clinical significance. Twenty-eight (19%) central core samples did not agree with the final pathologic diagnosis. Seven of these 28 patients each had a final diagnosis of cancer missed by the central core biopsy. The first core sample had a sensitivity for cancer detection of 79 per cent and specificity 100 per cent. SCNB remains a sensitive and specific identifier of breast pathology. When mammographic evidence of calcifications was the primary indication for SCNB (n = 75) calcification was present in the central core in 51 (68%). In these 51 patients the central core biopsy was in agreement with the final histologic diagnosis in 46 (90%) specimens. Histologic review of the first core sample alone lends no increased benefits and in fact misrepresents the pathology present in a significant number of patients. When analyzed as an independent predictor of breast pathology the first core is a more sensitive indicator than subsequent individual cores, but the most accurate predictor of pathology is examination of the entire group of core samples. This study confirms the need for acquisition of multiple cores from each lesion in question.