Objective: To evaluate the influence of obesity, age, and years since menopause on bone density. Methods: A retrospective analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) obtained from 588 women, 41 to 60 years, previously menopaused (1-10 years before). Results: Positive influence of obesity was confirmed by the significant differences in BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck (FN), and trochanter (TR) between the groups (p < 0.01). Age and years since menopause (YSM) were negatively correlated with BMD at all sites (p = 0.000). Comparing patients within 1 to < 6 YSM versus 6 to 10 YSM, BMD was higher in the former at LS and FN (p < 0.005), despite the higher BMI in the older group (p = 0.01). Obese patients had a lower prevalence of osteoporosis at LS and FN (p = 0.009). Regression analysis identified BMI as the strongest determinant of FN and TR BMD, while YSM was the strongest determinant of LS BMD. Conclusion: The protective effect of obesity is overtaken by age and estradiol deficiency. We recommend that even obese postmenopausal women should be screened for osteoporosis. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência de obesidade, idade e anos de menopausa sobre a densidade óssea. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva da densidade mineral óssea (DMO) obtida em 588 mulheres de 41 a 60 anos, já menopausadas (1-10 anos antes). Resultados: A influência positiva da obesidade foi confirmada através de diferenças significativas da DMO entre os grupos na coluna lombar (CL), colo de fêmur (CF) e trocânter (TR) (p < 0,01). Idade e anos desde a menopausa (ADM) foram correlacionados negativamente com DMO em todos os sítios (p = 0,000). Comparando-se pacientes entre 1 e < 6 ADM vs 6 e 10 AMD, a DMO foi maior no primeiro grupo na CL e CF (p < 0,005), apesar de maior DMO no grupo de mais idade (p = 0,01). Pacientes obesas tiveram uma prevalência mais baixa de osteoporose na CL e CF (p = 0,009). Análise de regressão identificou o IMC como o determinante mais forte da DMO de CF e trocânter, enquanto a ADM foi o determinante mais forte da DMO na CL. Conclusão: O efeito protetor da obesidade é sobrepujado pela deficiência de estradiol. Recomendamos que mesmo mulheres obesas na pós-menopausa devam ser examinadas para osteoporose.

Objective: To compare Brazilian and international criteria for assessing the nutritional status of schoolchildren.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 160 schoolchildren from a public school in the city of Rio de Janeiro, 91 boys and 69 girls, aged 7 to 9 full years. Body mass index (BMI) for sex and age was used to diagnose underweight, healthy weight and overweight, according to Cole et al., Conde & Monteiro and the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Student's t test, the chi-square test, the Kendall concordance test and the chi-square testfor tendencies were used to analyze the data; graphs were plotted demonstrating BMI by age, according to the nutritional diagnosis at each set of criteria.Results: Mean BMI did not differ by sex (t = 0.2845, p = 0.7789). According to the first two sets of criteria, none of the children were underweight, whereas, according to the WHO criteria, one of the boys was underweight. The Kendall test did not demonstrate any significant difference between the three sets of criteria (coefficient of concordance for boys was W < 0.0004 and for girls it was W < 0.0008, with p = 1.00). There was a greater proportion of assessments that did not agree among the boys, at 15.13%, while for the girls this figure was 13.04%. A significant tendency was observed for the difference between the criteria to increase with age among the boys (chi-square for tendencies = 6.552, p = 0.0105), which was evident on the graph and was independent of nutritional status. Conclusions:The criteria used here converged on the same result, without discrepancies between them or advantages for either. Nevertheless, among the boys there was a significant tendency for the diagnoses to differentiate and BMI to increase with age, which is a warning to take care when choosing among criteria.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84(6):550-555: Nutritional assessment, nutritional status, diagnostic methods, body mass index, children.

ResumoObjetivo: Comparar critério nacional e internacional para avaliação do estado nutricional de escolares.Métodos: Estudo transversal incluindo 160 crianças, 91 meninos e 69 meninas, de 7 a 9 anos completos, alunos de escola pública da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Utilizou-se o índice de massa corporal (IMC) por gênero e idade para diagnosticar baixo peso, peso adequado e excesso de peso, empregando-se critérios propostos por Cole et al., Conde & Monteiro e pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS).Foram aplicados teste t de Student, qui-quadrado, concordância de Kendall, qui-quadrado de tendência e gráficos demonstrando a evolução do IMC, segundo diagnóstico nutricional obtido com cada critério.Resultados: As médias de IMC não diferiram entre sexos (t = 0,2845 e p = 0,7789). Segundo critérios propostos por autores, não houve baixo peso, enquanto que para os critérios da OMS, ocorreu um caso de baixo peso entre meninos. O teste de Kendall não demonstrou diferença significativa entre os três critérios (coeficiente de concordância: meninos = W < 0,0004, meninas = W < 0,0008 e p = 1,00). As discordâncias na avaliação predominaram entre meninos, atingindo 15,13%, sendo 13,04% para meninas. Observou-se significativa tendência crescente de diferenciação dos critérios com a idade dos meninos (qui-quadrado de tendência = 6,552 e p = 0,0105), evidenciada no gráfico e independente do estado nutricional. Conclusões:Os critérios utilizados convergem para o mesmo resultado, não havendo discrepâncias ou vantagens entre eles.Entretanto, para meninos, houve significativa tendência de diferenciação nos diagnósticos e evolução do IMC por idade, alertando para cuidado na opção dos diferentes critérios.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84(6):550-555: Avaliação nutricional, estado nutricional, métodos de diagnóstico, índice de massa corporal, crianças. AbstractObjective: To compare Brazilian and international criteria for assessing the nutritional status of schoolchildren.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 160 schoolchildren from a public school in the city of Rio de Janeiro, 91 boys and 69 girls, aged 7 to 9 full years. Body mass index (BMI) for According to the first two sets of criteria, none of the children were underweight, whereas, according to the WHO criteria, one of the boys was underweight. The Kendall test did not demonstrate any significant difference between the three sets of criteria (coefficient of concordance for boys was W < 0.0004 and for girls it was W < 0.0008, with p = 1.00). There was a greater proportion of assessments that did not agree among the boys, at 15.13%, while for the girls this figure was 13.04%. A significant tendency was observed for the difference between the criteria to increase with age among the boys (chi-square for tendencies = 6.552, p = 0.0105), which was evident on the graph and was independent of nutritional status. Conclusions:The criteria used here converged on the same result, without discrepancies between them or advantages for either. Nevertheless, among the boys there wa...