e16269 Background: Combination of Gem+Nab-P is considered as a dose intense regimen which exhibits synergistic cytotoxic activity and equally effective in increasing survival as FOLFIRINOX regimen in pancreatic cancer. However, number of patients who tolerates such dose intense regimen is found to be less in Indian population. The importance of maintaining optimum RDI is well-known however a low RDI may reflect a poor tolerability. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify desired relative dose intensity and explore the potential of baseline NLR as a prognostic biomarker. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 26 patients with a median age of 65.5 years who received this drug combination either as first-line or second-line treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a single institution. Treatment outcome was measured using overall survival and toxicities were classified according to CTCAE guidelines. The thresholds for RDI of Gem and Nab-P, and baseline NLR cut-off for predicting survival was calculated by constructing ROC curves. Results: Median overall survival was 11.5 months. Median RDI of Gem and Nab-P was found to be 79% (30-94) and 71% (39 –114) respectively. We estimated a RDI cut-off of 67% in Nab-P and 68% in Gem and observed a statistically significant favorable outcome in patients who received Nab-P with RDI > 67% ( p-0.021). No significant relationship of Gem RDI with outcome was observed. Median overall survival was found to be higher in patients with a baseline NLR < 2.35, patients on D1, D8, D15 treatment regimen and those who received Nano particle bound paclitaxel. Complete assessment of study subjects are enlisted in the table. Grade 3 neuropathy, fatigue, and hyponatremia were reported in 2, 5 and 4 patients respectively. Grade 2 skin rashes and neuropathy were seen in 3 patients each. Conclusions: Our study concludes that tolerability of Gem+Nab P is a concern and it is expected to exhibit a durable response only if it achieves an optimum RDI of Nab-P. The study indicates varied efficacy in different pharmaceutical preparations of paclitaxel favoring the use of nano-particle formulations. The study also indicates that baseline NLR is an important prognostic biomarker in pancreatic cancer[Table: see text]

e15522 Background: Taxanes are an integral part of chemotherapy for a broad range of tumor types. The usual toxicities associated with Taxane use are peripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression and musculoskeletal adverse effects. Very few studies have reported taxane induced pulmonary toxicity objectively. In our study we explored Taxane induced pulmonary toxicity based on discrete CT findings. Methods: 40 non-smokers diagnosed with Her-2 negative breast cancer who received Taxane monotherapy from 2017 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for pre and post therapy CT changes. Following CT findings were considered significant as pulmonary toxicity; (a) Nonspecific area with ground-glass attenuation, (b) multifocal areas of airspace consolidation, (c) patchy distribution of ground-glass attenuation accompanied by interlobular septal thickening and (d) extensive bilateral ground-glass attenuation or airspace consolidations with traction bronchiectasis. The CT findings were assessed independently by two radiologists and one pulmonologist. Results: Our study showed that 5 patients (12.5%) developed pulmonary changes on chest CT post Taxane therapy as summarized in Table. Conclusions: Our study shows that taxane has more potential to induce pulmonary toxicity than reported in present literature. Given that taxanes are the most widely used chemotherapy, it is of utmost necessity to be cognizant of this under-reported potentially fatal adverse effect in a large population. Further studies should be conducted to better understand the true potential, mechanisms and patterns of taxanes induced pulmonary toxicity. [Table: see text]

e18802 Background: SAR, a known adverse event of cancer therapy has variable severity. Despite the availability of many approved grading tools, there is still a lack of a globally applicable grading system. To address this, World Allergy Organization (WAO) created a uniform 5-grade classification system which was modified recently to be applicable for all SAR’s. This study aims to understand the incidence and severity of chemotherapy induced SAR and overall response rate (ORR) of rechallenged drugs in a tertiary cancer center. Methods: A retrospective single centered analysis of 103 patients with chemotherapy induced SAR was carried out. Patients were stratified based on age, gender, drugs given, dose number and severity of reaction. We used Modified WAO Grading System for assessing the severity. Descriptive statistics was applied to decipher the data. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response to rechallenged drugs using RECIST Criteria for solid tumors and Lugano Classification for lymphoma. Results: Among 103 patients who reported SAR, 63.1% were female and 64.1% patients were less than 60 years of age. Among the 22 drugs, median dose number was high for Oxaliplatin (6) and Carboplatin (5). SAR was more observed with Paclitaxel (20.39%), Carboplatin (17.48%) and Rituximab (13.59%). However, carboplatin and rituximab had more incidence of grade 1 SAR(25.92% and 29.63% respectively). Grade 1 SAR (39.80%) were reported the highest followed by grade 3 (29.13%), grade 5 (13.59%), grade 2 (11.65%), and grade 4 (5.83%). Cetuximab precipitated the most grade 5 reactions (33.33%). Among patients exhibiting SAR with Paclitaxel, 42.86% were switched to alternatives, Nab-paclitaxel (28.57%) being preferred the most. Carboplatin was changed to cisplatin in 16.66% patients and Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension replaced docetaxel in 42.86% patients who reported SAR with carboplatin and docetaxel respectively. Rituximab was rechallenged the most (11.65%) off which one patient had reaction. ORR was observed to be 62.5% and 50% among rechallenged Paclitaxel and Rituximab respectively. The incidence of SAR is depicted in the below table. Conclusions: The study inferred that most SAR reactions occurred with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin. Oxaliplatin and Carboplatin presented with delayed SAR. Grade 1 and grade 3 reaction were relatively more. Cetuximab reported the most grade 5 reactions. ORR of rechallenged drugs should be monitored in further larger studies.[Table: see text]