One hundred seventy-five third-and fourth-grade boys who were identified as struggling readers participated in a 10-week intervention to determine the effect of the reading teachers' sex on boys' reading performance, selfperceptions as readers, and view of reading as a masculine, feminine, or gender-neutral activity. Findings indicated no main effects on reading performance, yet main effects of teacher's sex on two sub-scales of reader self-perception emerged. Evidence of interactions showed that boys responded differentially to the intervention-they responded better to female teachers. Further analysis revealed that the boys' responses varied as much as a response to individual male teachers as to the teacher's sex.
In response to concerns about boys' academic underachievement as well as the international gender imbalance in our teaching force composition, a call has been made to hire more male teachers and practice ‘boy-friendly’ pedagogy. Our investigation of effects of male reading teachers and use of computer-based books demonstrated their ability to de-feminise boys' views of reading but no differential effects were evident on boys' reading achievement or reader self-perceptions between boys taught by males or by females, whether or not they use technology in their reading practices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.