Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a cellular process during which epithelial cells acquire mesen chymal phenotypes and behaviour following the down regulation of epithelial features. EMT is triggered in response to signals that cells receive from their micro environment. The epithelial state of the cells in which EMT is initiated is characterized by stable epithelial cell-cell junctions, apical-basal polarity and interac tions with basement membrane. During EMT, changes in gene expression and posttranslational regulation mechanisms lead to the repression of these epithelial characteristics and the acquisition of mesenchymal char acteristics. Cells then display fibroblastlike morphol ogy and cytoarchitecture, as well as increased migratory capacity. Furthermore, these now migratory cells often acquire invasive properties (Fig. 1). EMT was first described by researchers studying early embryogenesis as a programme with welldefined cellular features 1,2. It is now widely accepted that EMT occurs normally during early embryonic development, to enable a variety of morphogenetic events, as well as later in development and during wound healing in adults.

Forward and backward transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes play crucial roles in embryonic development and tissue repair. Aberrantly regulated transitions are also a hallmark of cancer metastasis. The genetic network that regulates these transitions appears to allow for the existence of a hybrid phenotype (epithelial/mesenchymal). Hybrid cells are endowed with mixed epithelial and mesenchymal characteristics, enabling specialized capabilities such as collective cell migration. Cell-fate determination between the three phenotypes is in fact regulated by a circuit composed of two highly interconnected chimeric modules-the miR-34/SNAIL and the miR-200/ZEB mutual-inhibition feedback circuits. Here, we used detailed modeling of microRNAbased regulation to study this core unit. More specifically, we investigated the functions of the two isolated modules and subsequently of the combined unit when the two modules are integrated into the full regulatory circuit. We found that miR-200/ZEB forms a tristable circuit that acts as a ternary switch, driven by miR-34/ SNAIL, that is a monostable module that acts as a noise-buffering integrator of internal and external signals. We propose to associate the three stable states-(1,0), (high miR-200)/(low ZEB); (0,1), (low miR-200)/(high ZEB); and (1/2,1/2), (medium miR-200)/(medium ZEB)-with the epithelial, mesenchymal, and hybrid phenotypes, respectively. Our (1/2,1/2) state hypothesis is consistent with recent experimental studies (e.g., ZEB expression measurements in collectively migrating cells) and explains the lack of observed mesenchymalto-hybrid transitions in metastatic cells and in induced pluripotent stem cells. Testable predictions of dynamic gene expression during complete and partial transitions are presented. multistable decision circuit | partial EMT | cancer systems biology | microRNA modeling | metastable intermediate phenotypes U nderstanding cell-fate decisions during embryonic development and tumorigenesis remains a major research challenge in modern developmental and cancer biology (1). Over recent years, we have witnessed rapid progress in mapping the gene regulatory networks associated with cellular phenotype with applications to transitions from epithelial to mesenchymal modalities, to the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into progenitor cells, to the existence and role of cancer stem-like cells (CSC), and to the production of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Cellfate determinations in all of these examples involve changes in expression of various transcription factors (TFs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate cascades of regulatory networks, ultimately generating genome-wide gene-expression patterns and concomitant protein levels corresponding to a particular cell lineage (fate).The E/M Hybrid Phenotype. An archetypal example of cell-fate decisions concerns the forward and backward transitions between the epithelial (E) and mesenchymal (M) phenotypes (EMT and MET), transitions that play a critical role in embryonic deve...

Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes – the epithelial to ­mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its reverse the mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) – are hallmarks of cancer metastasis. While transitioning between the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes, cells can also attain a hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) (i.e., partial or intermediate EMT) phenotype. Cells in this phenotype have mixed epithelial (e.g., adhesion) and mesenchymal (e.g., migration) properties, thereby allowing them to move collectively as clusters. If these clusters reach the bloodstream intact, they can give rise to clusters of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), as have often been seen experimentally. Here, we review the operating principles of the core regulatory network for EMT/MET that acts as a “three-way” switch giving rise to three distinct phenotypes – E, M and hybrid E/M – and present a theoretical framework that can elucidate the role of many other players in regulating epithelial plasticity. Furthermore, we highlight recent studies on partial EMT and its association with drug resistance and tumor-initiating potential; and discuss how cell–cell communication between cells in a partial EMT phenotype can enable the formation of clusters of CTCs. These clusters can be more apoptosis-resistant and have more tumor-initiating potential than singly moving CTCs with a wholly mesenchymal (complete EMT) phenotype. Also, more such clusters can be formed under inflammatory conditions that are often generated by various therapies. Finally, we discuss the multiple advantages that the partial EMT or hybrid E/M phenotype have as compared to a complete EMT phenotype and argue that these collectively migrating cells are the primary “bad actors” of metastasis.