BackgroundIt was recently demonstrated that the size of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments that originates from tumor cells are shorter than cfDNA fragments that originates from non-malignant cells. We investigated whether cfDNA fragment size and cfDNA levels might have prognostic value in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.MethodsBlood samples were obtained from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, before (n = 61) initiation of chemotherapy and after the first cycle of chemotherapy (n = 39). Samples were separated with density centrifugation and plasma DNA was isolated. Mode cfDNA fragment size and cfDNA levels were then determined using a 2100 Bioanalyzer. A cohort of partially age-matched healthy volunteers (n = 28) constituted the control group.ResultsBoth a pre-treatment cfDNA fragment size of ≤ 167 bp (mode) and high pre-treatment cfDNA levels were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that pre-treatment cfDNA levels could independently predict prognosis for both PFS (HR = 3.049, p = 0.005) and OS (HR = 2.236, p = 0.028).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that cfDNA fragment size and cfDNA levels can be used to predict disease outcome in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The described approach, using a rapid, economic and simple test to reveal prognostic information, has potential for future treatment stratification and monitoring.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-018-1677-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background: Several publications have addressed the need for a systematic integration of oncological care focused on the tumor and palliative care (PC) focused on the patient with cancer. The exponential increase in anticancer treatments and the high number of patients living longer with advanced disease have accentuated this. Internationally, there is now a persuasive argument that introducing PC early during anticancer treatment in patients with advanced disease has beneficial effects on symptoms, psychological distress, and survival.
Background
There are no data on the effect of low‐dose anticoagulation as secondary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low‐dose apixaban for 30 months, after initial 6 months of full‐dose treatment.
Methods
We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE in a single arm interventional clinical trial. All patients were treated with full‐dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) for 6 months. Total 196 patients with active cancer after 6 months treatment continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for another 30 months. The main endpoints were recurrent VTE, major bleeding and clinically relevant non‐major bleeding.
Results
During the 30 months of treatment with low‐dose apixaban 14 (7.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0%–11.7%) patients experienced recurrent VTE, six (3.1%; 95% CI 1.1%–6.5%) experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.1%, 95% CI: 4.7%–12.8%) experienced clinically relevant non‐major bleeding. The incidence rate per person month of recurrent VTE was 0.8% (95% CI 0.41–1.6) at 2–6 months with full‐dose apixaban, and 1.0% (95% CI 0.5–1.9) at 7–12 months with low‐dose apixaban. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1% (95% CI 0.6–2.0) at 2–6 months, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1–1.0) at 7–12 months. Between 12 and 36 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low.
Conclusion
Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily seems safe after 6 months of full‐dose treatment. After 12 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleeding remained low.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.