Summary
Objective
To systematically review evidence on genetic risk factors for carbamazepine (CBZ)–induced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and provide practice recommendations addressing the key questions: (1) Should genetic testing for HLA‐B*15:02 and HLA‐A*31:01 be performed in patients with an indication for CBZ therapy to reduce the occurrence of CBZ‐induced HSRs? (2) Are there subgroups of patients who may benefit more from genetic testing for HLA‐B*15:02 or HLA‐A*31:01 compared to others? (3) How should patients with an indication for CBZ therapy be managed based on their genetic test results?
Methods
A systematic literature search was performed for HLA‐B*15:02 and HLA‐A*31:01 and their association with CBZ‐induced HSRs. Evidence was critically appraised and clinical practice recommendations were developed based on expert group consensus.
Results
Patients carrying HLA‐B*15:02 are at strongly increased risk for CBZ‐induced Stevens‐Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) in populations where HLA‐B*15:02 is common, but not CBZ‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (HSS) or maculopapular exanthema (MPE). HLA‐B*15:02–positive patients with CBZ‐SJS/TEN have been reported from Asian countries only, including China, Thailand, Malaysia, and India. HLA‐B*15:02 is rare among Caucasians or Japanese; no HLA‐B*15:02‐positive patients with CBZ‐SJS/TEN have been reported so far in these groups. HLA‐A*31:01–positive patients are at increased risk for CBZ‐induced HSS and MPE, and possibly SJS/TEN and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). This association has been shown in Caucasian, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and patients of mixed origin; however, HLA‐A*31:01 is common in most ethnic groups. Not all patients carrying either risk variant develop an HSR, resulting in a relatively low positive predictive value of the genetic tests.
Significance
This review provides the latest update on genetic markers for CBZ HSRs, clinical practice recommendations as a basis for informed decision making regarding the use of HLA‐B*15:02 and HLA‐A*31:01 genetic testing in patients with an indication for CBZ therapy, and identifies knowledge gaps to guide future research.
A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.12564/suppinfo.
Although much still needs to be done, it's clear that with concerted efforts and appropriate resources, change is possible but slow. Retaining and fostering public and political interest in paediatric medicines is challenging, but pivotal for success.
In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, we determined whether 2-month prednisolone therapy for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome was inferior or not to 6-month therapy despite significantly less steroid exposure. The primary end point was time from start of initial treatment to start of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio of 1.3 with one-sided significance of 5%. We randomly assigned 255 children with an initial episode of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome to either 2 - or 6-month treatment of which 246 were eligible for final analysis. The total prednisolone exposure counted both initial and relapse prednisolone treatment administered over 24 months. Median follow-up in months was 36.7 in the 2-month and 38.2 in the 6-month treatment group. Time to frequent relaps was similar in both groups; however, the median was reached only in the 6-month group (799 days). The hazard ratio was 0.86 (90% confidence interval, 0.64–1.16) and met the non-inferior margin. Time to first relapse was also similar in both groups: median day 242 (2-month) and 243 (6-month). Frequency and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups. Most adverse events were transient and occurred during initial or relapse therapy. Thus, 2 months of initial prednisolone therapy for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, despite less prednisolone exposure, is not inferior to 6 months of initial therapy in terms of time to onset of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.