Aurora kinase A is a member of a new family of serine/threonine kinases that includes Drosophila melanogaster Aurora and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ipl1 kinase, both of which are essential for controlling normal chromosome segregation and centrosome functions [1][2][3] . Aurora kinase A has been implicated in regulating centrosome function, spindle assembly, spindle maintenance and mitotic commitment in cells [4][5][6][7] . AURKA, encoding aurora kinase A, is a putative oncogene that is amplified and overexpressed in many human cancers [8][9][10][11][12][13] . The molecular targets of aurora kinase A have not been well characterized. We previously reported that phosphorylationmediated feedback between aurora kinase A and protein phosphatase 1 operates through mitosis and that disruption of this interaction results in defects in chromosome segregation 14 .Overexpression of aurora kinase A 8 and loss of wild-type p53 function induce similar phenotypes of centrosome amplification and aneuploidy in cells 15,16 . These observations suggest that gain of aurora kinase A function and loss of wild-type p53 function may be interdependent in common pathways. The finding that human tumors with elevated expression of aurora kinase A have wild-type TRP53 (encoding p53) also suggests that gain of aurora kinase A function may cause loss of wild-type p53 function, contributing to malignant transformation. p53 induces growth arrest or apoptosis in cells exposed to stress and is frequently mutated or deleted in human cancers. Expression of p53 is controlled by Mdm2, which promotes ubiquitination by E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and degradation of p53 by the cytoplasmic 26S proteasome 17 . Stability and activity of p53 are also regulated by post-translational modifications 18-23 including phosphorylation, acetylation, glycosylation and attachment of a small ubiquitin-related modifier protein. Phosphorylation at multiple sites is the predominant mechanism known to stabilize and abrogate Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination and activates p53. In contrast, phosphorylation of the core domain at Thr155 by the COP9 signalosome has been reported to target p53 for degradation 24 . The present study investigated whether phosphorylation by aurora kinase A also regulates p53 activity. RESULTS Aurora kinase A phosphorylates and interacts with p53We first investigated the ability of aurora kinase A to phosphorylate p53 in an in vitro kinase assay. We incubated bacterially expressed glutathione S-transferase (GST) and a GST-p53 fusion protein with aurora kinase A immunoprecipitated from mitotic HeLa cells and γ 32 P ATP. The aurora kinase A immunocomplex clearly phosphorylated GST-p53 (Fig. 1a). To confirm the specificity of aurora kinase A in phosphorylating p53, we used immunoprecipitated wild-type and kinase-inactive aurora kinase A (K162R) in an in vitro kinase assay with GST-p53. Wild-type aurora kinase A phosphorylated p53 but the kinase-inactive mutant did not (Fig. 1b), confirming that aurora A R T I C L E S

MDMX, an MDM2-related protein, has emerged as yet another essential negative regulator of p53 tumor suppressor, since loss of MDMX expression results in p53-dependent embryonic lethality in mice. However, it remains unknown why neither homologue can compensate for the loss of the other. In addition, results of biochemical studies have suggested that MDMX inhibits MDM2-mediated p53 degradation, thus contradicting its role as defined in gene knockout experiments. Using cells deficient in either MDM2 or MDMX, we demonstrated that these two p53 inhibitors are in fact functionally dependent on each other. In the absence of MDMX, MDM2 is largely ineffective in down-regulating p53 because of its extremely short half-life. MDMX renders MDM2 protein sufficiently stable to function at its full potential for p53 degradation. On the other hand, MDMX, which is a cytoplasmic protein, depends on MDM2 to redistribute into the nucleus and be able to inactivate p53. We also showed that MDMX, when exceedingly overexpressed, inhibits MDM2-mediated p53 degradation by competing with MDM2 for p53 binding. Our findings therefore provide a molecular basis for the nonoverlapping activities of these two p53 inhibitors previously revealed in genetic studies.The tumor suppressor gene p53 encodes a transcription factor that is activated in response to various forms of stress, leading to the induction of a number of genes whose products mediate either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis (1). Under most physiological conditions, p53 activity is tightly controlled, primarily through the ability of MDM2 to target p53 for degradation, which ensures cell survival. Current model of p53 activation suggests that diverse stress signals converge on a single regulatory node, namely the p53-MDM2 module, and interfere with the ability of MDM2 to target p53 for degradation (2). Analogous to MDM2, MDMX ablation is also associated with p53-dependent embryonic death in mice, placing MDMX in the category of essential p53 negative regulators (3). In contrast to MDM2, however, MDMX lacks ubiquitin E3 ligase activity and is unable to target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent proteolysis (4). Moreover, MDMX was reported to inhibit MDM2-mediated p53 degradation (4 -6), contradicting the role of MDMX as defined by the genetic study. To resolve these conflicting results and gain better understanding of why neither gene product can compensate for the loss of the other, we generated MDMX-deficient cells using small interference RNA (siRNA) 1 and carried out biochemical analysis of MDM2 in these cells. In conjunction with the use of MEFs derived from either single or double knock-out mice, our loss-of-function approach allowed us to obtain compelling evidence at the molecular level to highlight mutual dependence of MDM2 and MDMX in their functional inhibition of p53 and provide support for the findings obtained in genetic studies. /MDM2Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs (Dr. Carl Maki, Harvard School of Public Health), were maintained in minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovin...

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common types of human cancer. Typically, HNSCC cells show persistent invasion that frequently leads to local recurrence and distant lymphatic metastasis. However, molecular mechanisms associated with the invasion and metastasis of HNSCC remain poorly understood. Here, we identified periostin as an invasion-promoting factor in HNSCC by comparing the gene expression profiles between parent HNSCC cells and a highly invasive clone. Indeed, periostin overexpression promoted invasion and anchorage-independent growth both in vitro and in vivo in HNSCC cells. Moreover, periostin-overexpressing cells spontaneously metastasized to cervical lymph nodes and to the lung through their aggressive invasiveness in an orthotopic mouse model of HNSCC. Interestingly, periostin was highly expressed in HNSCCs in comparison with normal tissues, and the level of periostin expression was well correlated with the invasiveness of HNSCC cases. In summary, these findings suggest that periostin plays an important role in the invasion and anchorage-independent growth of HNSCC. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(14): 6928-35)