The paper describes a commercially available fly-over beamforming system based on methodologies already published, but using an array that was designed for quick and precise deployment on a concrete runway rather than for minimum sidelobe level. Time domain tracking Delay And Sum (DAS) beamforming is the first processing step, followed by Deconvolution in the frequency domain to reduce sidelobes, enhance resolution, and get absolute scaling of the source maps. The system has been used for a series of fly-over measurements on a Business Jet type MU300 from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Results from a couple of these measurements are presented: Contribution spectra from selected areas on the aircraft to the sound pressure level at the array are compared against the total sound pressure spectrum measured by the array. One major aim of the paper is to verify that the system performs well although the array was designed with quick deployment as a main criterion. The results are very encouraging. A second aim is to elaborate on the handling of the array shading function in connection with the calculation of the Point Spread Function (PSF) used in deconvolution. Recent publications have used a simple formula to compensate for Doppler effects for the case of flat broadband spectra. A more correct formula is derived in the present paper, covering also a Doppler correction to be made in the shading function, when that function is used in the PSF calculation. Nomenclature b(t) = DAS beamformed time signal B() = DAS beamformed frequency spectrum B ij () = DAS beamformed spectrum at focus point j due to model source i c = Propagation speed of sound DAS = Delay And Sum Df mi , Df mj = Doppler frequency shift factor at microphone m for signal from point i and j, respectively 2 f = Frequency H ij () = Element of Point Spread Function: From model source i to focus point j i = Index of monopole point source in Deconvolution source model, I = Number of focus/source points in calculation mesh j = Index of focus position, , or imaginary unit √ k = Wavenumber (k =  /c)  = Parameter defining steepness in radial cut-off of array shading filters m = Microphone index, M = Number of microphones M 0 = Mach number p m (t) = Sound pressure time signal from microphone m ̂ = Shaded time signal for microphone m P m () = Frequency spectrum from microphone m P mi () = Frequency spectrum from microphone m due to model source i PSF = Point Spread Function (2D spatial power response to a monopole point source)  model = DAS beamformed pressure power (pressure squared) from the point source model in deconvolution  measured = DAS beamformed pressure power from an actual measurement Q i () = Amplitude spectrum of model point source i r mj (t) = Distance from microphone m to moving focus point j r mj = Distance from microphone m to focus point j at the center of an averaging interval R m = Distance of microphone m from array center R coh () = Frequency dependent radius of active sub-array s mi (t) = Distance from microphone m to moving source po...

No abstract

This paper describes an experimental study on a notched nozzle for jet noise reduction. The notch, a tiny tetrahedral dent formed at the edge of a nozzle, is expected to enhance mixing within a limited region downstream of the nozzle. The enhanced mixing leads to the suppression of broadband peak components of jet noise with little effect on the engine performance. To investigate the noise reduction performances of a six-notch nozzle, a series of experiments have been performed at an outdoor test site. Tests on the engine include acoustic measurement in the far field to evaluate the noise reduction level with and without the notched nozzle, and pressure measurement near the jet plume to obtain information on noise sources. The far-field measurement indicated the noise reduction by as much as 3 dB in terms of overall sound pressure level in the rear direction of the engine. The use of the six-notch nozzle though decreased the noise-benefit in the side direction. Experimental data indicate that the high-frequency components deteriorate the noise reduction performance at wider angles of radiation. Although the increase in noise is partly because of the increase in velocity, the penetration of the notches into the jet plume is attributed to the increase in sound pressure level in higher frequencies. The results of near-field measurement suggest that an additional sound source appears up to x/D = 4 due to the notches. In addition, the total pressure maps downstream of the nozzle edge, obtained using a pressure rake, show that the notched nozzle deforms the shape of the mixing layer, causing it to become wavy within a limited distance from the nozzle. This deformation of the mixing layer implies strong vortex shedding and thus additional noise sources. To improve the noise characteristics, we proposed a revised version of the nozzle on the basis of a computational prediction, which contained 18 notches that were smaller than those in the 6-notched nozzle. Ongoing tests indicate greater noise reduction in agreement with the computational prediction.

Jet noise remains a significant noise component in modern commercial aero-engines. A high-speed flow mixing with the surrounding air constitutes noise sources behind the nozzle. One noise-reduction technology is a mixing device attached to the nozzle. Several fixed-geometry mixers such as chevrons have been studied by both computational and experimental approaches. The authors have previously proposed a notched nozzle with dents allocated along the nozzle lip and discussed its ability to reduce the noise level. The revised notch was expected to suppress the broadband jet-mixing noise as well as additional noise at higher frequencies. However, further assessments are required before proceeding to a large-scale engine test in an outdoor environment. First, the influence of the gas temperature on acoustic results must be tested because the temperature affects the mean jet velocity and sound propagation. As the preliminary noise test in the previous paper was limited to the cold-jet condition, far-field noise data under the hot-jet condition should be investigated. Second, the aerodynamic performance must be evaluated. Data on the flow rate and thrust would help in considering the aerodynamic performances between the baseline, notched, and chevron nozzles. This study focuses on noise tests for the finer-notched nozzle under the hot-gas condition. A small jet engine for model jet planes was employed to generate a high-temperature jet. An engine test stand was designed to monitor the engine performance data, consisting of the pressure and temperature at several positions, the fuel flow rate, and the thrust. The hot-jet test with and without the mixing device served as a compact and flexible test for aerodynamic evaluation of the nozzle. The noise test results under the hot-jet condition with this rig showed that the noise reduction characteristics of the finer-notched nozzle are different from those of conventional mixers.

This paper describes an experimental study on the acoustic performance when mixer nozzles were applied to the core of a subscale turbofan engine. The primary concern of the mixer nozzle is how to satisfy both less jet mixing noise emission and minimum impact on engine performance parameters such as thrust and fuel consumption. A notched nozzle, a nozzle with tiny dents on the trailing edge, initiates small disturbances in the shear layer, weakens the shear stress, and suppresses jet noise. The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and IHI Corporation have studied notched nozzles and found that finer and more notches are preferable for both acoustic and aerodynamic performance. As a next step, it is necessary to maintain the tradeoff between noise suppression and impact on engine performance. To evaluate both the acoustic and aerodynamic performance with the notched nozzle, a subscale turbofan engine, DGEN380, was adopted as a demonstration engine. Experiments with this engine were conducted both in a test cell and in an open test site. The notched nozzle, together with a baseline conical nozzle and a referential serrated nozzle, i.e., a chevron nozzle, was applied to the core exhaust of the engine. The experiment in the test cell clarified that the notched nozzle possibly provides better thrust specific fuel consumption than the referential chevron nozzle. The acoustic measurement in the open environment confirmed that the notched nozzle has the noise suppression characteristics expected from previous test results. The perceived noise levels are attenuated by 1.5 dB, which is the same as or better than the referential mixer nozzle.