Objective 1) To examine clinician adherence to a standardized assessment battery across settings (acute hospital, IRF, outpatient facility), professional disciplines (PT, OT, SLP), and time of assessment (admission, discharge/monthly), and 2) evaluate how specific implementation events affected adherence. Design Retrospective cohort study Setting Acute hospital, IRF, outpatient facility with approximately 118 clinicians (PT, OT, SLP). Participants 2194 participants with stroke who were admitted to at least one of the above settings. All persons with stroke undergo standardized clinical assessments. Interventions N/A Main Outcome Measure Adherence to Brain Recovery Core assessment battery across settings, professional disciplines and time. Visual inspections of 17 months of time-series data were conducted to see if the events (e.g. staff meetings) increased adherence ≥ 5% and if so, how long the increase lasted. Results Median adherence ranged from 0.52 to 0.88 across all settings and professional disciplines. Both the acute hospital and IRF had higher adherence than the outpatient setting (p ≤ .001) with PT having the highest adherence across all three disciplines (p < .004). Of the 25 events conducted across the 17 month period to improve adherence, 10 (40%) resulted in a ≥ 5% increase in adherence the following month, with 6 services (60%) maintaining their increased level of adherence for at least one additional month. Conclusion Actual adherence to a standardized assessment battery in clinical practice varied across settings, disciplines and time. Specific events increased adherence 40% of the time with gains maintained for greater than a month in 60%.

Participants poststroke can be classified into meaningful groups based on assessment scores from their initial physical therapist and occupational therapist evaluations. These assessment scores, in part, guide poststroke acute care discharge recommendations.

Date Presented 4/20/2018 A discord between the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills suggests that a discrepancy exists between older adults’ subjective perception and occupational therapists’ objective evaluation of occupational performance early in the disablement process. Primary Author and Speaker: Chiung-ju Liu Additional Authors and Speakers: Hilary Harris, Alyssa Davis, Louella Schoenfeld, Taylor Romero

Background and Issues: Patient volume increased significantly over first half of 2011 on the Neurology Service. Bed occupancy increased by 14% over previous year and bed availability became a major constraint. Data showed, patients were discharged late in the day or sometimes stayed an extra night because discharge orders were released too late to place patients in rehab or skilled nursing facilities. Only 16% of patients were discharged by 2:00 pm due to communication barriers and inadequate information exchanged between multidisciplinary teams. There was also an issue with inconsistent acceptance criteria from primary placement facilities which resulted in a longer length of stay. Purpose: Primary goal of project was to free up capacity on the Nursing Division to accommodate the increase in patient volumes without increasing staffing or the number of available beds. Methods: In September 2011, a multidisciplinary team was assembled to understand causes of the problems and develop solutions to resolve. Solutions implemented include working with partner Rehab and Skilled Nursing Facilities to define standardized Acceptance Guidelines to ensure issues could be addressed before day of discharge. Also, processes for releasing discharge orders were redesigned so orders were more frequently written and placed “on hold” the day before expected discharge. A mobile computer was issued to physician rounding teams so orders could be released during rounds instead of batch-released in the afternoon. Additionally, team communication was significantly improved by standardizing a daily multidisciplinary team huddle and implementing a visual communication board to track key information about patients to proactively plan for discharge. Results: The overall length of stay of patients on the Neurology Service decreased from 4.26 days in 2011 to 3.69 days in 2012. Conclusions: Many variables contributed to the decrease in length of stay for patients in this study. No decisive conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of any particular variable. Other variables during this timeframe likely contributed, however the authors of this study presented the most likely factors. Although the findings are exciting, further analysis is needed to isolate the main drivers.

No abstract