There has been an increase in recent years in the use of empirical methods in healthcare ethics. Appeals to empirical data cannot answer moral questions, but insights into the knowledge, attitudes, experience, preferences and practice of interested parties can play an important part in the development of healthcare ethics. In particular, while we may establish a general ethical principle to provide explanatory and normative guidance for healthcare professionals, the interpretation and application of such general principles to actual practice still requires interpretation and judgement. And many situations in healthcare practice are complex and may involve a variety of principles, each of which may conflict with the others. Simple surveys or interview studies may not be sufficient if we wish to develop a nuanced approach to ethical practice that can be set out in guidelines, codes or directives. We do not resolve moral questions by plebiscite. In this paper, the authors argue for the use of consensus methods to develop shared understanding of ethical practice, and they argue further for the combination of the Delphi method with the use of vignettes to illustrate the kind of situations that may occur in practice. They develop their argument in part by reference to their experience of using this approach in their recent research.

No abstract

The impact of a rapidly ageing population on the development of insurance policies and health and social care services of older people is a major concern in Japan. The discussion in this paper draws on information gained from recent visits to leaders of these services in Japan. The paper briefly reviews the policy and demographic background to recent legislative changes in the long-term care insurance system, models of care management and assessment and outstanding challenges for health and social care professionals. Some key issues have emerged with implications for interprofessional working, such as the lack of integrated care systems, contradictions within the scope and responsibilities of care management, and the absence of quality and ethical frameworks to safeguard the interests of the service user and carer.