A number of clinical investigations and postmortem brain studies have provided evidence that excessive corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) secretion and neurotransmission is involved in the pathophysiology of depressive illness, and several studies have suggested that the hyperactivity in CRH neurotransmission extends beyond the hypothalamus involving several extra-hypothalamic brain regions. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that CRH levels are increased in specific brainstem regions of suicide victims with a diagnosis of major depression. Frozen tissue sections of the pons containing the locus coeruleus and caudal raphe nuclei from 11 matched pairs of depressed suicide and control male subjects were processed for radioimmunocytochemistry using a primary antiserum to CRH and a [125] I-IgG secondary antibody. The optical density corresponding to the level of CRHimmunoreactivity (IR) was quantified in specific pontine regions from the film autoradiographic images. The level of CRH-IR was increased by 30% in the locus coeruleus, 39% in the median raphe and 45% in the caudal dorsal raphe in the depressed suicide subjects compared to controls. No difference in CRH-IR was found in the dorsal tegmentum or medial parabrachial nucleus between the subject groups. These findings reveal that CRH-IR levels are specifically increased in norepinephrine-and serotonin-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men, and thus they are consistent with the hypothesis that CRH neurotransmission is elevated in extra-hypothalamic brain regions of depressed subjects.

Context.— Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity is used in the evaluation of hemolysis risk in patients being assessed for G6PD deficiency. A long-acting 8-aminoquinoline drug (tafenoquine) used in malaria treatment is contraindicated in patients with G6PD deficiency (<70% normal G6PD activity). The current state of G6PD reporting practices to support clinical eligibility assessment is poorly understood. Objective.— To assess clinical laboratory reporting practices for G6PD testing. Design.— In October 2019 and October 2020, voluntary questionnaires were distributed to 327 and 324 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists G6PD proficiency testing (PT). Results.— Two hundred fifty-seven and 119 laboratories responded to the 2019 and 2020 questionnaires, respectively. Few laboratories have received clinical questions about average normal G6PD activity (US/Canada, 2.0% [3 of 149]; international, 8.4% [9 of 107]), whereas slightly more have determined the average normal G6PD activity for their own assay and patient populations (US/Canada, 6.7% [10 of 149]; international, 19.4% [21 of 108]). Few laboratories report G6PD activity in percent of normal format (US/Canada, 2.7% [4 of 149]; international, 8.3% [9 of 108]). The most common unit of measurement in use for quantitative G6PD reporting is unit per gram of hemoglobin. Reference intervals vary based on assay, reaction temperature, and participant laboratory and demonstrate moderate correlation (r = .46–.51) to G6PD activity measured from a “normal” PT challenge specimen. Nearly half of participants (47.8% [85 of 178]) categorized a quantitatively “intermediate” G6PD PT challenge as “normal” when using qualitative assays. Conclusions.— Percent of normal G6PD activity reporting would facilitate patient eligibility assessment for drugs, such as tafenoquine. Quantitative assays are better able to differentiate “intermediate” specimens than qualitative assays.

No abstract