Parenteral nutrition (PN) has revolutionized the care of patients with intestinal failure by providing nutrition intravenously. Worldwide, PN remains a standard tool of nutrition delivery in neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients. Though the benefits are evident, patients receiving PN can suffer serious cholestasis due to lack of enteral feeding and sometimes have fatal complications from liver injury and gut atrophy, including PN-associated liver disease or intestinal failure-associated liver disease. Recent studies into gut-systemic cross talk via the bile acid-regulated farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) axis, gut microbial control of the TGR5-glucagon-like peptide (GLP) axis, sepsis, and role of prematurity of hepatobiliary receptors are greatly broadening our understanding of PN-associated injury. It has also been shown that the composition of ω-6/ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids given parenterally as lipid emulsions can variably drive damage to hepatocytes and cell integrity. This manuscript reviews the mechanisms for the multifactorial pathogenesis of liver disease and gut injury with PN and discusses novel ameliorative strategies. (Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35:63-71)
Objective Combining 18F-FDG PET with whole-body MR for paediatric cancer staging is practically feasible if imaging protocols can be streamlined. We compared 18F-FDG PET/STIR with accelerated 18F-FDG PET/FSPGR for whole-body tumour imaging in children and young adults. Methods Thirty-three children and young adults (17.5±5.5 years, range 10–30 years) with malignant lymphoma or sarcoma underwent a 18F-FDG PET staging exam, followed by ferumoxytol-enhanced STIR and FSPGR whole-body MR. 18F-FDG PET scans were fused with MR data and the number and location of tumours on each integrated exam was determined. Histopathology and follow-up imaging served as standard of reference. The agreement of each MR sequence with the reference and the whole-body imaging times were compared using Cohen’s kappa coefficient and student t-test, respectively. Results Comparing 18F-FDG PET/FSPGR to 18F-FDG PET/STIR, sensitivities were 99.3% for both, specificities were statistically equivalent, 99.8% versus 99.9% and the agreement with the reference based on Cohen’s kappa coefficient was also statistically equivalent, 0.989 versus 0.992. However, the total scan-time for accelerated FSPGR of 19.8±5.3 minutes was significantly shorter compared to 29.0±7.6 minutes for STIR (p=0.001). Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/FSPGR demonstrated equivalent sensitivities and specificities for cancer staging compared to 18F-FDG PET/STIR, but could be acquired with shorter acquisition time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.