ICRS implantation has shown effectiveness and safety in most cases, including combined procedures. In properly selected eyes, it can improve both refraction and vision in patients with keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):829-839.].
Purpose: To describe the epidemiological profile of patients waiting for penetrating keratoplasty in state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Methods: Transversal and retrospective study, with 871 patients, in the period of 06/01/2011 a 05/31/2012, were registered on the waiting list for corneal transplantation in the Central of Notification, Captation and Distribution of Organs (CNCDO) of Pernambuco. Registration forms of cornea receiving were used, adapted to the purposes of this research. Results: In relation to frequency, it was obtained 54% female, 35% aged 61 to 80 years; 60% transplanted; 52% from the metropolitan area of Recife; 57% that waited 1 to 6 months the transplant; 82% with optical indication for transplant, 5% with priority on the waiting list (48% of those with ocular perforation) and; 37% whose transplant center was the Fundação Altino Ventura (FAV). The main indications for corneal transplantation were leukoma (33%), keratoconus (22%) e bullous keratopathy (18%). Conclusion: It was found that most patients were aged 61 to 80 years; was from the metropolitan area of Recife; was submitted to corneal transplantation; waited for one to six months to do the transplantation; had the diagnosis leukoma, followed by keratoconus and bullous keratopathy; was indicated to transplantation optical and had the transplant center to FAV.
Purpose: To analyze 15-year of corneal transplant in Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional, retrospective, observational, and analytical study, between available data from the Brazilian Transplant Registry (January 2002–December 2016), collected by the Brazilian Association of Organ Transplantation was performed. The variables analyzed per year were number of corneal transplants, corneal transplants per million people (pmp), corneal transplant teams, and individuals on the waiting list for corneal transplants. Quantitative variables were expressed by their respective values. To verify the relationship of time with the variables, the Spearman correlation test was applied, adopting P<0.05 for rejection of the null hypothesis. Results: Evaluation of the data from 2002 to 2016 revealed an increase in number of (1) corneal transplants (4,976–14,534—approximately 292% in 15 years; P<0.0001); (2) corneal transplants pmp (29.4–71.1 pmp; P<0.0001); (3) productivity of corneal transplants teams (40.1–79 transplants by each team per year; P=0.067); (4) effectiveness in meeting the Brazilian population demand for corneal transplants per year (18.2%–57.0%; P<0.0001); (5) potential donors (P<0.0001), effective donors (P<0.0001), and nondonors (P<0.0001). There was a reduction in the number of patients on the waiting list (19,189–10,923; P=0.056). Conclusion: Despite the progress in the last decade, the number of corneal transplants in Brazil cannot meet the growing population demand. Thus, this study suggests the implementation of more effective public policies of corneal transplants in Brazil, to minimize disparities in national territory, adequately meet the population demand, and reduce the time in waiting lists for corneal transplants.
Purpose: To evaluate ophthalmological emergencies in a public reference hospital in Pernambuco. Methods: Cross-sectional retrospective study with 26.358 patients attended in the ophthalmic emergency Altino Ventura Foundation, in the period january to june 2013. Data were collected using protocols based on electronic registration forms of ophthalmological emergency Results: It was observed that 52.5% of patients were male, 42.5% were aged 21-40 years; 90.8% were from the region metropolitan area of Recife; 55% classified as less severe. The main diagnoses were conjunctivitis (35.17%) and ocular trauma (19.25%). Conclusion: The prevalence of male patients, aged 21-40 years, from the metropolitan area of Recife, classified as low complexity, attended in January, on Monday, with the diagnosis of conjunctivitis, followed by ocular trauma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.