The trial sponsor was involved in the study design, the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and the decision to submit the article for publication. Maruho also paid for professional writing assistance. Nemolizumab and placebo were provided by the product manufacturer,
Background
Amenamevir is a helicase-primase inhibitor with novel mechanisms of anti-herpetic action. A patient-initiated single-dose regimen showed clinical efficacy for genital herpes in a phase 2 study.
Methods
In this phase 3 study, adult immunocompetent patients with recurrent genital herpes and able to accurately recognize prodromal symptoms were randomly assigned to administer amenamevir 1200 mg or placebo as a patient-initiated therapy within 6 hours after onset of prodromal symptoms. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to healing of all genital herpes lesions.
Results
In the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded patients with aborted lesions (amenamevir, n = 89; placebo, n = 97), the median time to all lesion healing was 4.0 days for amenamevir versus 5.1 days for placebo (hazard ratio 1.60; 95% confidence intervals, 1.19–2.15; P = .0018), indicating superiority of amenamevir. All treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups were mild in severity.
Conclusions
Patient-initiated single-dose amenamevir reduced the time to all lesion healing of recurrent genital herpes versus placebo, with no safety concerns, suggesting it could be an effective treatment option for patients with recurrent genital herpes.
Clinical Trial Registration
JapicCTI-194955 (https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/ShowDirect.jsp?clinicalTrialId=33260)
Amenamevir (ASP2151), a novel, non‐nucleoside analog, antiviral drug, inhibits the enzyme activities of helicase and primase, which are essential for replication of herpes viral genomic DNA. In this phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter study, the authors investigated the efficacy and safety of a single patient‐initiated dose of amenamevir to treat recurrent herpes labialis. Adult immunocompetent patients with recurrent herpes labialis who had the experience and ability to recognize prodromal symptoms were randomly assigned to administer amenamevir 1200 mg or placebo as a patient‐initiated therapy within 6 hours after onset of prodromal symptoms. The primary efficacy end point was time to healing of all herpes labialis lesions in the modified intention‐to‐treat population. Secondary efficacy end points were time to crusting of all herpes labialis lesions, time to resolution of pain accompanying herpes labialis, proportion of patients with aborted lesions, and time to resolution of subjective symptoms accompanying herpes labialis. The modified intention‐to‐treat population, which excluded patients with aborted lesions, comprised 298 patients who self‐initiated amenamevir and 307 who took placebo. Amenamevir demonstrated superiority over placebo for the primary end point; the median time to all lesion healing was 5.1 days for amenamevir versus 5.5 days for placebo (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.46; p = 0.0085). Time to crusting of all lesions was significantly shorter with amenamevir versus placebo (p = 0.0065); there were no significant between‐group differences in other secondary outcomes. Treatment‐emergent adverse events in both groups were generally mild in severity; there were two moderate events that were judged unrelated to study treatment, and no severe or serious events. In summary, a single patient‐initiated dose of amenamevir 1200 mg taken within 6 hours of prodromal symptom onset significantly shortened the time to all lesion healing of recurrent herpes labialis compared with placebo, with no clinically important safety concerns.
We here discuss two patterns of asymptotic variance of 𝜷𝜷 � EL under the assumption that 𝜿𝜿, 𝜶𝜶, and 𝜸𝜸 𝑗𝑗𝑗𝑗 are known/unknown parameters. Let 𝜶𝜶 𝑠𝑠 denote an 𝑎𝑎 𝑠𝑠 -dimensional parameter vector, and 𝜸𝜸 𝑗𝑗𝑗𝑗 𝑘𝑘 denote a ℎ 𝑘𝑘 -dimensional parameter vector.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.