Thromboembolism and bleeding remain significant complications of ventricular assist device (VAD) support. Increasing the amount of biocompatibility data collected during preclinical studies can provide additional criteria to evaluate device refinements, while design changes may be implemented before entering clinical use. Twenty bovines were implanted with the EVAHEART centrifugal VAD for durations from 30 to 196 days. Titanium alloy pumps were coated with either diamond-like carbon or 2-methoxyethyloylphosphoryl choline (MPC). Activated platelets and platelet microaggregates were quantified by flow cytometry, including two new assays to quantify bovine platelets expressing CD62P and CD63. Temporally, all assays were low preoperatively, then significantly increased following VAD implantation, before declining to a lower, but still elevated level over 2-3 weeks. MPC-coated VADs produced significantly fewer activated platelets after implant trauma effects diminished. Three animals receiving no postoperative anticoagulation had similar amounts of circulating activated platelets and platelet microaggregates as animals receiving warfarin anticoagulation. Two new methods to quantify bovine activated platelets using antibodies to CD62P and CD63 were characterized and applied. These measures, along with previously described assays, were able to differentiate between two biocompatible coatings and assess effects of anticoagulation regimen in VAD preclinical testing.
The risk of cerebrovascular accident increases with a longer ventricular assist device support period. Infection may activate platelet function and predispose the patient to a cerebrovascular accident. An elevation of the white blood cell count may also exacerbate the risk of cerebrovascular accident even in patients without infection. Selection of device type, prevention of infection, and meticulous control of anticoagulation are key to preventing cerebrovascular accident.
Although continuous flow (CFVAD) and pulsatile (PVAD) ventricular assist devices (VADs) are being clinically used, their effects upon aortic blood flow as a measure of overall blood distribution remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of CFVAD and PVAD support for ascending (AscA) and descending (DA) aorta outflow cannulation upon mean aortic blood flow and waveform morphology. Six experiments were conducted in a normal, acute calf model, in which an inflow cannula was implanted in the left ventricle apex and outflow cannulae were anastomosed to both the AscA and DA. Flow probes were placed around the pulmonary artery, pump outflow, brachiocephalic trunk, and aorta proximal and distal to the DA outflow. For each acute experiment, calves received randomly selected levels of VAD support (0-100% of cardiac output) and pump failure (VAD off and outflow cannula unclamped) for each of four randomly selected test conditions: (1) PVAD and AscA, (2) PVAD and DA, (3) CFVAD and AscA, and (4) CFVAD and DA. Regardless of pump type or support level, proximal and distal aorta mean flows were lower (p < 0.05) for DA compared with the AscA. No differences in mean aortic flows between pump types at either outflow graft location were discerned. Differences in morphologic features of blood flow waveforms between PVAD and CFVAD were observed. During simulated pump failure, retrograde aortic blood flow in both the aortic arch and DA was observed. Partial ventricular suction was also observed during the greatest levels of CFVAD support and suggested pronounced effects upon both the right and left ventricle. Collectively, these findings imply that VAD outflow location may have an important role in patient response and recovery. Investigation of the long-term pathophysiologic responses to pump type and outflow location is ongoing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.