Background: Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the diagnosis of the uterine cavity and tuboperitoneal abnormalities in infertile women. Reproducibility and consistency were also assessed. Two hundred infertile females underwent HSG, hysteroscopy, and/or laparoscopy as part of infertility workup. HSG examinations were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists; we compared interobserver variability, and differences between the two results of reading the same examination after 3 months were compared to calculate intraobserver variability. HSG sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were calculated. Results: The overall accuracy of HSG in diagnosing tubal, uterine cavity, and peritoneal abnormalities was 95.5%, 95%, and 89%, respectively (P value < 0.04). HSG is reproducible in diagnosing normal versus abnormal examinations. Reproducibility in diagnosing uterine cavity, tubal, and peritoneal abnormalities was (ICC = 0.90), (ICC = 0.70), and (ICC = 0.31), respectively. Best agreement was seen in diagnosing luminal filling defect (sub mucous fibroid/polyp) (ICC = 0.90) (95% CI 0.86-0.98), whereas poorest agreement was found in diagnosing uterine adhesions (ICC = 0.13) (95% CI 0.10-0.13) and pelvic adhesions (ICC = 0.12) (95% CI 0.10-0.13) (P value < 0.03). HSG consistency ranged from moderate to good (K = 0.49-0.79). It was highest in diagnosing normal versus abnormal examination (P value < 0.01); poorest in diagnosing pelvic adhesions. Conclusion: HSG has high validity in negative results; it can minimize the use of invasive procedures. Laparoscopy is recommended in patients who had a pelvic disease or showing tubal obstruction on HSG.
This study planned to compare the predictive ability of maternal urinary vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) versus N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) for prediction of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). This was a prospective case-control study carried out in a tertiary university hospital. It included pregnant women between 37-39 weeks. The study included 50 pregnant women classified in two groups. Group (Ι, n=25) were pregnant women with PAS, and group (II, n=25) women with uncomplicated pregnancies, as controls. Urine samples were collected, and quantitative analyses of VEGF and NT-pro BNP were performed by ELISA. VEGF was assessed with a cut point of 215.6 pg/ml and NT-pro BNP with a cut point of 182.2 pg/ml to predict the condition of PAS. Both biomarkers were good predictors of PAS with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) equal to (0.871 and 0.904), respectively. However, maternal urinary VEGF levels could predict PAS better than NT-pro BNP (OR=9.967, 95%CI 2.032–48.879, p=0.005) versus (OR=8.066, 95% CI 1.520 – 42.811, p=0.014) in NT-pro BNP. In conclusion, third trimester urinary levels of both VEGF and NT-pro BNP appear to be s crucially good predictors for PAS. However, VEGF is superior to NT-pro BNP in predicting women with PAS. These biomarkers present promising candidates as they can help to detect patients at high probability of PAS. They can be assessed by non-invasive, simple, and low-cost procedures.
Background Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (2D-TVUS) and gel infusion sonography (GIS) at offline analysis for endometrial characterization compared with real-time evaluation during scanning. One hundred fifty women presented with PMB. At TVUS, endometrial thickness was ≥ 4 mm in 122 (81.3%) women and < 4 mm in 28 (18.72%). Among 122 women with endometrial thickness > 4 mm, GIS was successfully performed in 117 (95.9%). Examinations were stored as video clips for later evaluation (offline analysis) by two less experienced radiologists. Endometrial lesions were classified into four categories: no endometrial abnormality, hyperplasia, polyps, and cancer. Diagnostic efficiency of real-time and offline analysis for diagnosis of each category was calculated and compared, and inter-observer agreement for offline analysis was calculated. Results All patients underwent hysteroscopy and/or hysterectomy. Histopathological results confirmed no endometrial abnormality in (27.3%, 41/150), endometrial hyperplasia in (12.7%, 19/150), endometrial polyps in (17.3%, 26/150), and endometrial cancer in (42.7%, 64/150). Overall diagnostic accuracy of real-time imaging was 89.7% (CI 84–91%)). The highest accuracy 92.7% (CI 88–98%) was seen in the diagnosis of cancer, and polyps 91.5% (CI 86–97%). The lowest accuracy 75% (CI 69–82%) was seen in hyperplasia. Overall diagnostic accuracy of offline analysis was 81%, and it increased to 88% (CI 83–92%) after a restricted analysis of good quality clips. The highest accuracy 90.7% (CI 83–95%) was seen in the diagnosis of polyps, and cancer 90.4% (CI 83–96%). The lowest accuracy 71% (CI 69–75%) was seen in hyperplasia. At offline analysis, the inter-observer agreement was substantial k = 0.77 (CI 71–84) in the evaluation of four endometrial categories after the exclusion of bad quality videos. It was excellent in exclusion of endometrial abnormalities k = 0.85 (0.78–0.90), substantial in the diagnosis of polyps k = 0.71 (0.69–0.88), cancer k = 0.61 (0.61–0.77), and moderate in the diagnosis of hyperplasia k = 0.41 (0.30–0.41). Conclusion Offline 2D analysis with a good image quality has comparable accuracy to a real-time evaluation during scanning in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. It can increase the accuracy of sonography in ruling out endometrial abnormalities and diagnose non-hyperplastic endometrial pathologies. High NPV and substantial reproducibility can make it an efficient initial screening method in a post-menopausal bleeding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.